Mark H Weaver :
> Alternatively, you could make sure to always compile your code, in which
> case 'procedure-name' should work properly.
Not a problem.
Marko
Marko Rauhamaa writes:
> Mark H Weaver :
>
>> This is expected but not ideal. Our primitive evaluator does not
>> preserve non-toplevel variable names, and therefore the associated
>> procedure names are lost. Maybe we can fix this in Guile 2.2.
>
> I noticed the issue because I have software tha
Marko Rauhamaa writes:
> Mark H Weaver :
>
>> This is expected but not ideal. Our primitive evaluator does not
>> preserve non-toplevel variable names, and therefore the associated
>> procedure names are lost. Maybe we can fix this in Guile 2.2.
>
> I noticed the issue because I have software tha
Mark H Weaver :
> This is expected but not ideal. Our primitive evaluator does not
> preserve non-toplevel variable names, and therefore the associated
> procedure names are lost. Maybe we can fix this in Guile 2.2.
I noticed the issue because I have software that depends on the
procedure-name of
Marko Rauhamaa writes:
> Consider this program:
>
> ===begin test.scm===
> (define (hello) #f)
> (format #t "~S\n" (procedure-name hello))
>
> (define (xyz)
> (define (hello) #f)
> (format #t "~S\n" (procedure-name hello)))
>
> (xyz)
> ===en
