Marko Rauhamaa <ma...@pacujo.net> writes:
> Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org>:
>
>> This is expected but not ideal. Our primitive evaluator does not
>> preserve non-toplevel variable names, and therefore the associated
>> procedure names are lost. Maybe we can fix this in Guile 2.2.
>
> I noticed the issue because I have software that depends on the
> procedure-name of inner functions. I can live with this guile-2.0 quirk
> if it is considered a guile defect.
I consider it a guile defect, yes. Can you please send a bug report to
bug-gu...@gnu.org? I'll look into whether it can be fixed in 2.0.x, and
try to come up with a workaround.
Thanks,
Mark
