Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org>: > This is expected but not ideal. Our primitive evaluator does not > preserve non-toplevel variable names, and therefore the associated > procedure names are lost. Maybe we can fix this in Guile 2.2.
I noticed the issue because I have software that depends on the procedure-name of inner functions. I can live with this guile-2.0 quirk if it is considered a guile defect. However, if the semantics of procedure-name of inner functions is unspecified, I'll have to look at refactoring my code. Marko
