Mark H Weaver writes:
> The problem is that the partial continuation created by
> 'abort-to-prompt' includes a stack frame for 'hash-for-each', which is
> implemented in C. Guile does not support invoking partial continuations
> that include C stack frames. This is Andy's area, not mine, but I
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes:
> Out of interest, I tried implementing a hash table cursor using
> hash-for-each and delimited continuations:
>
> (use-modules
> (srfi srfi-9)
> (ice-9 hash-table))
>
> (define-record-type
> (make-cursor %co
Out of interest, I tried implementing a hash table cursor using
hash-for-each and delimited continuations:
(use-modules
(srfi srfi-9)
(ice-9 hash-table))
(define-record-type
(make-cursor %cont key value)
cursor?
(%cont %cursor-cont)
(key cursor-key)
David Thompson writes:
> I am pleased to announce the release of Shroud 0.1. Shroud is a
> simple secret manager with a command line interface. The password
> database is stored as a Scheme s-expression and encrypted with a GnuPG
> key. Secrets consist of an arbitrary number of key/value pairs
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 09:58:32 schrieb Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı
> /Kammer:
>> Exactly, I agree. It should be noted though that some things can be
>> implemented purely as portable libraries, so there needn't be a Request
>> For Implementations to do it, w
Arne Babenhauserheide :
> Making Scheme as usable as Python requires finding an elegance which
> fits Scheme and allows creating applications at least as easily as
> with Python — but not necessarily in the same style.
The main thing is to keep the S expressions' data/code duality. Python
doesn't
2015-10-01 0:16 GMT+02:00 Arne Babenhauserheide :
> Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 08:39:44 schrieb Panicz Maciej Godek:
> > > > others), then it would be most harmful to the Scheme community,
> because
> > > > that would increase code enthropy and force programmer to make an
> > > > irrelevant
Mark H Weaver writes:
> taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes:
>
>> I've made pretty fine experiences with R7RS-small so far[0][1][2][3],
>> and after seeing people's disdain towards R7RS-large's direction and
>> agreeing with them (although I wouldn't trust my own judgm
Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 09:58:32 schrieb Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı /Kammer:
> Exactly, I agree. It should be noted though that some things can be
> implemented purely as portable libraries, so there needn't be a Request
> For Implementations to do it, whereas some other things, which I call
>
Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 08:39:44 schrieb Panicz Maciej Godek:
> > > others), then it would be most harmful to the Scheme community, because
> > > that would increase code enthropy and force programmer to make an
> > > irrelevant choice.
> >
> > It’s no more irrelevant than the choice betwe
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes:
> I've made pretty fine experiences with R7RS-small so far[0][1][2][3],
> and after seeing people's disdain towards R7RS-large's direction and
> agreeing with them (although I wouldn't trust my own judgment alone),
> I've decided to
11 matches
Mail list logo
