Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 09:58:32 schrieb Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı /Kammer: > Exactly, I agree. It should be noted though that some things can be > implemented purely as portable libraries, so there needn't be a Request > For Implementations to do it, whereas some other things, which I call > "fundamental" features, need to be supported by implementations, so they > need to be in the language specification or an authoritative SRFI.
What is an authoritative SRFI? One which is available in most implementations? Best wishes, Arne -- 1w6 sie zu achten, sie alle zu finden, in Spiele zu leiten und sacht zu verbinden. → http://1w6.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
