Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> writes: > Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 09:58:32 schrieb Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı > /Kammer: >> Exactly, I agree. It should be noted though that some things can be >> implemented purely as portable libraries, so there needn't be a Request >> For Implementations to do it, whereas some other things, which I call >> "fundamental" features, need to be supported by implementations, so they >> need to be in the language specification or an authoritative SRFI. > > What is an authoritative SRFI? One which is available in most > implementations?
Yeah, broadly speaking an SRFI that has wide acceptance, or is set out to gain wide acceptance by means of being as uncontroversial as possible and such. > Best wishes, > Arne Taylan
