Noah Lavine writes:
> The only change I was considering is allowing an arbitrary number of
> arguments, but that's something I can implement if people agree that
> we want the functions in (ice-9 q).
I'm loath to add anything to (ice-9 q) since I find the names, and
the lack of a distinct type,
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Ian Price wrote:
>
> I'm loath to add anything to (ice-9 q) since I find the names, and
> the lack of a distinct type, less than satisfactory.
>
Fair enough. I'd be just as happy to implement a new queue container. I
think we need to keep (ice-9 q) around f
Hi,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> I went ahead and pushed a proper merge of stable-2.0 into master.
Great, thanks! Which method did you use?
Ludo’.
Hi,
Ian Price skribis:
> Noah Lavine writes:
>
>> The only change I was considering is allowing an arbitrary number of
>> arguments, but that's something I can implement if people agree that
>> we want the functions in (ice-9 q).
>
> I'm loath to add anything to (ice-9 q) since I find the names
Hi!
Daniel Llorens skribis:
> today I filed a bug on generalized-vector->list
>
> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12465
>
> I remember similar bugs in the past, and I'm thinking that these functions
> are redundant since we have array-ref, array->list, and so on, which also
> work
