Hello, On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Ian Price <ianpric...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I'm loath to add anything to (ice-9 q) since I find the names, and > the lack of a distinct type, less than satisfactory. >
Fair enough. I'd be just as happy to implement a new queue container. I think we need to keep (ice-9 q) around for compatibility, though, so I'm tempted to say we should go ahead and make it as good as it can be. > However, if you are going to add them, I'd recommend sticking with the > q- prefix. So, q-append and q-append!. Keeping the naming consistent > means one less exception to remember. > > Also, I think it might be wise to add a list->q and q->list, with the > obvious simple implementations > You're right. :-) Noah
