Hi, Ian Price <ianpric...@googlemail.com> skribis:
> Noah Lavine <noah.b.lav...@gmail.com> writes: > >> The only change I was considering is allowing an arbitrary number of >> arguments, but that's something I can implement if people agree that >> we want the functions in (ice-9 q). > > I'm loath to add anything to (ice-9 q) since I find the names, and > the lack of a distinct type, less than satisfactory. +1. And there are functional queue implementations around that are worth promoting, IMO. Ian: would you like to turn (pfds queues) into a patch against Guile? :-) Thanks, Ludo’.
