David Pirotte wrote:
> Guile has a wrapper to the ultra-hip clutter library :) See here:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile-gnome/
>
> If you are interested and need help for installing, let me know...
Thanks David, but I'm working on a little extension for making games
and Clutter seem
Hello Javier,
> > http://www.gnu.org/software/guile-gnome/
> Thanks David, but I'm working on a little extension for making games
> and Clutter seems done for GUI.
But it uses cogl, which we still lack from guile. It would be nice if you take a
quick look at it and if it suites your need
Hi Mark!
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> Thanks for your review. I have pushed the first six patches, with all
> of your suggestions applied except that I didn't make 'scm_t_read_opts'
> const, because it needs to be mutated when encountering a reader
> directive, as you later acknowledged on IRC.
Ye
Reply to myself :)
Javier,
> take a look at the doc on how to write a wrapper: you'll find them if you git
> clone guile-gnome [and guile-clutter for your coding curiosity maybe], or
> browse
> the git repo ...
the doc i pointed are [too] old, I am sorry.
You'd want to read HACKING whi
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>> So, what about exposing a ‘set-port-read-options!’ procedure, and then
>>> using it to write tests?
>>
>> That's a lot of extra work. It means designing, implementing, and
>> documenting
David Pirotte wrote:
> But it uses cogl, which we still lack from guile. It would be nice if you
> take a
> quick look at it and if it suites your needs, rather helping with the cogl
> wrapper.
I didn't know cogl. I've to play with this a little, integration
between OpenGL and OpenGL ES is very
Here's an improved version of the patch set, incorporating Ludovic's
suggestions and rebased on the current stable-2.0 branch.
Comments and suggestions solicited.
Thanks,
Mark
>From 77834798bb67076ff6c7a3fd939b2bb55353faff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark H Weaver
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2
Mark H Weaver:
> Here's an improved version of the patch set, incorporating Ludovic's
> suggestions and rebased on the current stable-2.0 branch.
I haven't had a chance to review the code in depth, but I find it *very*
encouraging that this patch includes a nice long test suite for SRFI-105. In
