Hello!
"Neil Jerram" writes:
> We're clearly moving towards a 2.0 release.
Cool!
> 2. The "vm" branch. Once the review of "master" is done, we'll merge
> "vm" into "master".
>
> 3. The "ossau-gds-dev" branch. This contains some minor improvements
> to the Emacs interface. After the review o
2009/1/5 Ludovic Courtès :
>
> "Neil Jerram" writes:
>
>> Nice. Regarding the merge to master, though,
>>
>> - I think that would imply that the VM is included in the next release
>> series (1.10.x or 2.0.x); is that your intention? (I have no
>> objection!)
>
> No objection either, but... some
Hey hey,
On Mon 05 Jan 2009 17:06, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> "Neil Jerram" writes:
>
>> Nice. Regarding the merge to master, though,
>>
>> - I think that would imply that the VM is included in the next release
>> series (1.10.x or 2.0.x); is that your intention? (I have no
>> ob
2009/1/4 Neil Jerram :
> 2009/1/4 David Séverin :
>> Hi Guilers,
>>
>> It might be a small thing [and of course not a priority at all], but I'd
>> love to see
>> a small evolution of the manual index structure in order to separate scheme
>> procedures from others, scheme variables from others...:
Le Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:25:47 +,
"Neil Jerram" a écrit :
> 2009/1/4 David Séverin :
> > Hi Guilers,
> >
> > It might be a small thing [and of course not a priority at all], but I'd
> > love to
> > see a small evolution of the manual index structure in order to separate
> > scheme
> > procedur
Hi Neil,
"Neil Jerram" writes:
> I meant commits like this one:
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guile.git;a=commit;h=9320e9339085b4d004c255eb55619819fe0b3ca2.
>
> Another bigger example, by me, is
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guile.git;a=commit;h=69986e21d30b85bd0b4fd7e81cd24c
Season greetings hackers!
"Neil Jerram" writes:
> Nice. Regarding the merge to master, though,
>
> - I think that would imply that the VM is included in the next release
> series (1.10.x or 2.0.x); is that your intention? (I have no
> objection!)
No objection either, but... some benchmarking
Hello,
Andy Wingo writes:
> Well, there are larger tests, in that the normal test suite passes with
> VM-compiled code (e.g. ice-9 and all that).
Yes, I remember reading that (and that is reassuring!), but I think it's
good to have unit tests for the compiler/VM too.
> And there are smaller te
Hello,
I modified in the BDW-GC branch to transparently have all
`SCM_SYMBOL ()' invocations use a statically allocated stringbuf. The
symbol itself still has to be interned then so for simplicity the
implementation statically allocates an immutable string and then uses
`string->symbol' at initi
On Jan 5, 2009, at 19:02, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Alas, there's no portable way that I know of to ask the compiler to
align double cells on 8-byte boundaries so that Guile actually
recognizes them as cells. GCC's `aligned' attribute does the job, but
is not portable. So this can't be committed,
10 matches
Mail list logo
