Season greetings hackers! "Neil Jerram" <neiljer...@googlemail.com> writes:
> Nice. Regarding the merge to master, though, > > - I think that would imply that the VM is included in the next release > series (1.10.x or 2.0.x); is that your intention? (I have no > objection!) No objection either, but... some benchmarking would be really nice. :-) Also, what's the status of the VM/compiler test suite? > - if yes to that, even so it might help us to hold off on the merge > for now, until we've finished reviewing everything else in > branch_release-1-8..master, and moving _out_ anything that should be > in the next release series. Did you mean "that should *not* be"? > Now the last point makes it sound as though there's actually a plan > here, and I'm afraid there isn't really. But I've recently been > looking at the branch_release-1-8..master diffs, and reverting some > that shouldn't have been there, and I think Ludovic may have been > doing a little of that too. What are you referring too? Some time between 1.8.5 and 1.8.6, I added `SCM_INTERNAL' and then reverted it from `branch_release-1-8' as it would have caused ABI incompatibilities. But that's the only thing I remember of. Do you think there are things currently in `master' that should be reverted? Thanks, Ludo'.
