Hello, Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes:
> Well, there are larger tests, in that the normal test suite passes with > VM-compiled code (e.g. ice-9 and all that). Yes, I remember reading that (and that is reassuring!), but I think it's good to have unit tests for the compiler/VM too. > And there are smaller tests, which test that VM compilation and > execution produces the same result as interpretation. But there are no > unit tests of the compiler itself. Also, these particular tests are not > yet integrated with the main test suite. I see. > Benchmark-wise, there's not much. I am not currently running many > benchmarks, fwiw -- been focusing more on correctness. Maybe "we" could start focusing on that now that the VM/compiler have matured a lot? Thanks! Ludo'.
