On Fri 22 Nov 2019 17:00, Nala Ginrut writes:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 03:34 Amirouche Boubekki
> wrote;
>
> link:
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/guile.html#Extending-the-Compiler
>
> In that section, maybe add a note about a web assembly backend?
>
> +1
> In the past decade, we'
Le lun. 18 nov. 2019 à 12:43, Mikael Djurfeldt a écrit :
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 3:45 PM Andy Wingo wrote:
>>
>> Hey all :)
>>
>> The library syntax for R7RS is a subset of R6RS, so to use R7RS you just
>> (import (scheme base)) and off you go. As with R6RS also, there are
>> some small lexi
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 03:34 Amirouche Boubekki
wrote;
>
> link:
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/guile.html#Extending-the-Compiler
>
> In that section, maybe add a note about a web assembly backend?
>
+1
In the past decade, we've gotten some experiences about compiler frontend
around
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 3:45 PM Andy Wingo wrote:
>>
>> Hey all :)
>>
>> Just a little heads-up that I just landed R7RS support. Thanks to Göran
>> Weinholt for akku-scm (https://gitlab.com/akkuscm/akku-r7rs/) and
>> OKUMURA Yuki for yuni (https://github.com/okuoku/yuni), off of which
>> some o
Wonderful!
Then I guess the texts in sections 9.1.5 and 9.4.7 in the manual should be
updated? I would have submitted a patch if I knew better how to reformulate.
Best regards,
Mikael
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 3:45 PM Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hey all :)
>
> Just a little heads-up that I just landed R
Andy Wingo writes:
> not an error to refer to it as such. In any case, it does not seem to
> me that R7RS-large is similar to the other reports in the RnRS series.
> To me it is more similar in flavor to the SRFI process.
R7RS-large seems to me like an effort to build a foundation for mobility
Hi,
On Sun 17 Nov 2019 16:52, Linus Björnstam writes:
> The text about the standards process is probably going to annoy people
> since it does not mention the division between r7rs small and large :)
I suppose that is fair, as I am annoyed by R7RS :) However, the report
published in 2013 does
Wow! Great job!
The text about the standards process is probably going to annoy people since it
does not mention the division between r7rs small and large :)
last time I checked, r7rs large was on path to become a much larger language
than common lisp, and the goal the whole time was a large
