Le lun. 18 nov. 2019 à 12:43, Mikael Djurfeldt <mik...@djurfeldt.com> a écrit : > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 3:45 PM Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> Hey all :) >> >> The library syntax for R7RS is a subset of R6RS, so to use R7RS you just >> (import (scheme base)) and off you go. As with R6RS also, there are >> some small lexical incompatibilities regarding hex escapes; see "R7RS >> Incompatibilities" in the manual. Also there is a --r7rs command-line >> option.
I do not think the library syntax for R7RS is a _subset_ of R6RS. For one, it rely on `define-library` instead of `library`. For anyone trying to write (and benchmark!) code across scheme implementations, you will have some luck with -x options: -x EXTENSION add EXTENSION to the front of the load extensions You can call guile with: guile -x .guille.scm ... And use .guile.scm as an extension for guile specific files. Also, in R6RS library form, the form `import` is not defined that is you can not do: (library (mylib) (export myfunc) (import (scheme base)) ...) ref: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38760
