Hi, On Sun 17 Nov 2019 16:52, Linus Björnstam <linus.bjorns...@veryfast.biz> writes:
> The text about the standards process is probably going to annoy people > since it does not mention the division between r7rs small and large :) I suppose that is fair, as I am annoyed by R7RS :) However, the report published in 2013 does bear the name R7RS and not R7RS-small, so it's not an error to refer to it as such. In any case, it does not seem to me that R7RS-large is similar to the other reports in the RnRS series. To me it is more similar in flavor to the SRFI process. Andy
