> From: Mark H Weaver
> Cc: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès), guile-devel@gnu.org,
> gdb-patc...@sourceware.org
> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 02:50:36 -0500
>
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
> > Also, since the only way I could get a functional MinGW Guile was to
> > configure it without threads, I would su
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> Also, since the only way I could get a functional MinGW Guile was to
> configure it without threads, I would suggest that this be the default
> for MinGW, but that isn't a big deal.
FWIW, the situation seems to have improved since you last looked. In
the last couple of we
Eli Zaretskii skribis:
>> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
>> Cc: xdj...@gmail.com, gdb-patc...@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:53 +0100
>>
>> > Sorry, I meant why that code couldn't be used when Guile was built
>> > without pthreads.
>>
>> Because with
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: xdj...@gmail.com, gdb-patc...@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:53 +0100
>
> > Sorry, I meant why that code couldn't be used when Guile was built
> > without pthreads.
>
> Because with the patch Doug posted, both the
Eli Zaretskii skribis:
>> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
>> Cc: xdj...@gmail.com, gdb-patc...@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:45:27 +0100
[...]
>> >> The non-pthread code is used when Guile is built without pthread
>> >> support. In that case, the async
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Right, when Guile is built with pthread support, it has a signal
> delivery thread. The actual SIGINT handler ('take_signal' in scmsigs.c)
> just write one byte to a pipe; the signal delivery thread reads from
> that pipe, and queues an as
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: xdj...@gmail.com, gdb-patc...@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:45:27 +0100
>
> >> I don’t remember, Eli: do you have patches pending review for these
> >> issues and other MinGW issues in Guile?
> >
> > I don't know, you
Eli Zaretskii skribis:
>> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patc...@sourceware.org,
>> guile-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:20:39 +0100
>>
>> Doug Evans skribis:
>>
>> I don’t remember, Eli: do you have patches pending review for these
>> issues and o
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patc...@sourceware.org,
> guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:20:39 +0100
>
> Doug Evans skribis:
>
> I don’t remember, Eli: do you have patches pending review for these
> issues and other MinGW issues in Guile?
I don
Doug Evans skribis:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:59:22 -0800
>>> From: Doug Evans
>>> Cc: "gdb-patc...@sourceware.org" ,
>>> guile-devel@gnu.org
>>>
>>> >> +void
>>> >> +gdbscm_initialize_sigint (void)
>>> >> +{
>>> >> + siscm_sigint_pi
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:59:22 -0800
>> From: Doug Evans
>> Cc: "gdb-patc...@sourceware.org" ,
>> guile-devel@gnu.org
>>
>> >> +void
>> >> +gdbscm_initialize_sigint (void)
>> >> +{
>> >> + siscm_sigint_pipe[0] = siscm_sigint_pipe[1] = -1
> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:59:22 -0800
> From: Doug Evans
> Cc: "gdb-patc...@sourceware.org" ,
> guile-devel@gnu.org
>
> >> +void
> >> +gdbscm_initialize_sigint (void)
> >> +{
> >> + siscm_sigint_pipe[0] = siscm_sigint_pipe[1] = -1;
> >> +
> >> + if (!SCM_USE_PTHREAD_THREADS)
> >> +{
> >>
[+ guile-devel]
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Doug Evans
>> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:26:27 -0500
>>
>> Unworkable-as-is optimization trying to avoid queueing asyncs. Blech.
>>
>> I'm still seeing intermittent testsuite failures because Guile is
>> getting an u
13 matches
Mail list logo
