> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > Cc: xdj...@gmail.com, gdb-patc...@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:53 +0100 > > > Sorry, I meant why that code couldn't be used when Guile was built > > without pthreads. > > Because with the patch Doug posted, both the SIGINT thread and GDB’s > main thread would call libguile. > > A different strategy would need to be used when Guile lacks pthread > support.
Could you perhaps suggest such a different strategy?
