Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> skribis: >> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) >> Cc: xdj...@gmail.com, gdb-patc...@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:53 +0100 >> >> > Sorry, I meant why that code couldn't be used when Guile was built >> > without pthreads. >> >> Because with the patch Doug posted, both the SIGINT thread and GDB’s >> main thread would call libguile. >> >> A different strategy would need to be used when Guile lacks pthread >> support. > > Could you perhaps suggest such a different strategy?
Something similar to Guile’s own strategy when compiled without pthread support. However, Doug is proposing on guile-devel an approach that may solve that more elegantly. Thanks, Ludo’.
