Re: Exposing `scm_i_mem2number ()'

2006-02-16 Thread Tomas Zerolo
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:57:12PM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote: [...] > But, what about scm_string_to_number (scm_from_locale_string (...))? > Isn't that good enough? Alas, attractive as it is it won't work: number representations vary across locale settings (basically, it's decimal point and thou

Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3

2005-12-16 Thread Tomas Zerolo
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 08:32:02AM +, Neil Jerram wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tomas Zerolo) writes: > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:47:13PM +, Neil Jerram wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> > >> > OTOH, http:/

Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3

2005-12-15 Thread Tomas Zerolo
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:47:13PM +, Neil Jerram wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > > OTOH, http://community.schemewiki.org/?variable-naming-convention > > suggests a different naming convention. > > Now that really is a horrible convention. Hmm, how can we best > conf

Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #2

2005-10-20 Thread Tomas Zerolo
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 09:48:50AM +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote: > Hi Neil, > > Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I don't think it should be connected with modules, though. In my > > view: > > > > - modules should be about identifier access and visibility (including > > issues such