On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 08:32:02AM +0000, Neil Jerram wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tomas Zerolo) writes: > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:47:13PM +0000, Neil Jerram wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> > >> > OTOH, http://community.schemewiki.org/?variable-naming-convention > >> > suggests a different naming convention. > >> > >> Now that really is a horrible convention. Hmm, how can we best > >> confuse someone coming to Scheme from another language for the first > >> time? > > > > To be fair, they seem just to be reporting on current use (which is an > > useful service). > > I wasn't criticising the people who compiled the Wiki page; it's a > very useful page. I'm specifically casting aspersions on the idea of > the apparent `$name' convention for fluids.
Right, sorry. On re-reading this is definitely the more plausible interpretation. regards -- tomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
