On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 09:48:50AM +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote: > Hi Neil, > > Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I don't think it should be connected with modules, though. In my > > view: > > > > - modules should be about identifier access and visibility (including > > issues such as possible separate compilation in future), and nothing > > else (and yes, this does imply that #:use-syntax was a mistake) > > Right. > > > - the appropriate unit of scope for your custom readers should be the > > file, not the module; for two reasons in particular: > > This makes sense, too.
[snip] But don't we loose the possibility then to have ``embedded goo´´ (say, for example, something like a snippet of SQL in an otherwise Scheme file)? This would be, I think, one of the nifty uses for pluggable readers... May be I'm completely off-base, since quite swamped ATM. If so, ignore. Thanks -- tomás
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
