Hello everybody,
I've been following some discussions about GSoC here and in the IRC and
I would like to say that I would love to work with you in this winter
;).
For those who are normally in the IRC, I'm didi. :D
As I can see, there are two main ideas:
1. CPAN for Guile
2. RoR for Guile
Noah Lavine writes:
> Hello,
>
>>> I think it would make sense to include ‘fmt’ in core Guile only if the
>>> API is reasonably stable and there are infrequent upstream releases, so
>>> we don’t quickly end up shipping an old incompatible version.
>>
>> Agreed, and I don't know if this is the cas
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> Andreas Rottmann writes:
>
>> So, that's around 5% improvment (on the ZIP benchmark) for an IMHO
>> significantly more hackish implementation. I'm not sure that's worth
>> it. WDYT?
>
> Was it with ‘fixnum?’ inline, or with the ‘fixnum?’ instru
Hello,
>> I think it would make sense to include ‘fmt’ in core Guile only if the
>> API is reasonably stable and there are infrequent upstream releases, so
>> we don’t quickly end up shipping an old incompatible version.
>
> Agreed, and I don't know if this is the case or not.
>
> I would add on a
Hello,
A few more thoughts...
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Fri 25 Mar 2011 18:58, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> "Andy Wingo" writes:
>>
>>> bdw-gc 6.8 compatibility (hopefully)
>>
>> Aarrrgh. The intent has always been to support 7.x only (bdw-gc.h has
>> compatibility stuff for
Hello,
Andreas Rottmann writes:
> So, that's around 5% improvment (on the ZIP benchmark) for an IMHO
> significantly more hackish implementation. I'm not sure that's worth
> it. WDYT?
Was it with ‘fixnum?’ inline, or with the ‘fixnum?’ instruction?
It’s ironic that while R6RS fixnums are a pe
Hello!
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Fri 25 Mar 2011 19:06, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
[...]
>>> I think that in 2.2 we should not expose libgc interfaces in libguile,
>>
>> That would be great, but then ‘scm_cell’, ‘SCM_NEWSMOB’, etc. would
>> need to do a funct
Hi!
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Sun 27 Mar 2011 13:56, Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> On Sun 27 Mar 2011 13:30, Andy Wingo writes:
>>
(And Guile crashes upon ,bt.)
>>>
>>> I wonder if this indicates some compilation bug.
>>
>> Indeed it does; it's a bug in Guile, not sxml-match.
>>
>> The following
> On Sun 27 Mar 2011 13:56, Andy Wingo writes:
>
> > On Sun 27 Mar 2011 13:30, Andy Wingo writes:
> >
> >>> (And Guile crashes upon ,bt.)
> >>
> >> I wonder if this indicates some compilation bug.
> >
> > Indeed it does; it's a bug in Guile, not sxml-match.
> >
> > The following expression exhib
Hello,
Andreas Rottmann writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> Besides it’s still unclear (to me) what the future of Wak and similar
>> projects is. I hope that it will take off, but I haven’t forgotten
>> Snow, ScmPkg, etc. either.
>>
> Well, there's a (IMHO) important dif
Hello!
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Sun 13 Mar 2011 16:25, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> The problem is that ‘hash-create-handle!’ above created a weak-cdr
>> pair—i.e., a pair whose cdr is /not/ scanned for pointers—but ‘set-cdr!’
>> did not register a disappearing link from O to K+V.
On Sun 27 Mar 2011 13:56, Andy Wingo writes:
> On Sun 27 Mar 2011 13:30, Andy Wingo writes:
>
>>> (And Guile crashes upon ,bt.)
>>
>> I wonder if this indicates some compilation bug.
>
> Indeed it does; it's a bug in Guile, not sxml-match.
>
> The following expression exhibits this bug:
>
> (car
On Mon 14 Mar 2011 18:40, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I can reproduce the problem:
Me too. How weird.
scheme@(guile-user)> (sxml-match '(to "Trove") ((to ,cv) (list cv)) (,_ #f))
$5 = ("Trove")
scheme@(guile-user)> (define x (sxml-match '(to "Trove") ((to ,cv) (list cv))
(,_ #f)))
On Mon 14 Mar 2011 18:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I think it would make sense to include ‘fmt’ in core Guile only if the
> API is reasonably stable and there are infrequent upstream releases, so
> we don’t quickly end up shipping an old incompatible version.
Agreed, and I don't k
On Fri 11 Mar 2011 17:48, Noah Lavine writes:
> Guile supports srfi-23 (the `error' procedure), and probably has
> forever, but it's not documented. This patch adds a note in the manual
> saying we support it, and also adds srfi-23 to our list of cond-expand
> features that we support.
Applied,
Hello zhangxy,
On Fri 11 Mar 2011 14:31, Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:21 AM, zhangxy wrote:
>> Now I want to analyze the test coverage of Lilypond.
>
> Apparently there is a new mechanism for finding coverage. See
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/C
On Sun 13 Mar 2011 16:25, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> The problem is that ‘hash-create-handle!’ above created a weak-cdr
> pair—i.e., a pair whose cdr is /not/ scanned for pointers—but ‘set-cdr!’
> did not register a disappearing link from O to K+V. Consequently, O
> eventually gets
On Mon 14 Mar 2011 18:35, Klaus Schilling writes:
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Subject: Re: Fmt Module
> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:16:17 +0100
>>
>> When we do include external libs, we should strive to leave upstream
>> files unmodified, as is done for (sxml ssax), (system base lalr
On Sun 27 Mar 2011 13:30, Andy Wingo writes:
>> (And Guile crashes upon ,bt.)
>
> I wonder if this indicates some compilation bug.
Indeed it does; it's a bug in Guile, not sxml-match.
The following expression exhibits this bug:
(car
(letrec ((f (lambda ()
(call-with-prompt
Hello Mike,
I just tried again to cross compile a win32 version of guile, using
the latest 2.0.0 release. My last attempt in April 2010 failed.
Much has been improved since then, but there are still fatal
errors, so I still can't support guile-2 in mingw-cross-env. [1]
1)
The first issue is th
Hello Mike,
I just tried again to cross compile a win32 version of guile, using
the latest 2.0.0 release. My last attempt in April 2010 failed.
Much has been improved since then, but there are still fatal
errors, so I still can't support guile-2 in mingw-cross-env. [1]
1)
The first issue is th
21 matches
Mail list logo
