Hello, Andreas Rottmann <a.rottm...@gmx.at> writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: [...] >> Besides it’s still unclear (to me) what the future of Wak and similar >> projects is. I hope that it will take off, but I haven’t forgotten >> Snow, ScmPkg, etc. either. >> > Well, there's a (IMHO) important difference in that Wak packages are > based on R6RS, which specifies a module system. But it doesn’t specify how modules are mapped to files. And there’s R7RS, which specifies and slightly incompatible module system, and there’s people who’ll always want to use their implementation’s native module system, etc. Let’s hope I’m overly pessimistic. :-) Thanks, Ludo’.
