Hello, Andreas Rottmann <a.rottm...@gmx.at> writes:
> So, that's around 5% improvment (on the ZIP benchmark) for an IMHO > significantly more hackish implementation. I'm not sure that's worth > it. WDYT? Was it with ‘fixnum?’ inline, or with the ‘fixnum?’ instruction? It’s ironic that while R6RS fixnums are a performance hack, they end up being less efficient than unbounded integers in Guile. Do you know how other implementations deal with that? Thanks, Ludo’.
