Re: Crypto Review

2009-08-18 Thread Michael Gorven
On Monday 17 August 2009 19:15:23 Duboucher Thomas wrote: > I have a stupid question what's the difference between the tip in > your Mercurial repository[1] and the head in your Bazaar repository[2]? The Mercurial repo is deprecated. I'll actually remove it. -- http://michael.gorven.za.net

Re: [GITGRUB] FB driver for EFI

2009-08-18 Thread Bean
Hi, Here is the raw patch. On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 03:20:19PM +0800, Bean wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch adds efi fb driver, with it, you can use graphic mode in EFI. >> >> Add the following modules in grub.efi: >> >> video efi_fb gfxterm fo

Re: Crypto Review

2009-08-18 Thread Duboucher Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Gorven a écrit : > On Monday 17 August 2009 19:15:23 Duboucher Thomas wrote: >> I have a stupid question what's the difference between the tip in >> your Mercurial repository[1] and the head in your Bazaar repository[2]? > > The Mercurial

Re: grub-mkconfig fails on every non i386-pc because of gfxterm/vbe

2009-08-18 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 13:04 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 18:09 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder' > Serbinenko: > > The correct solution would be to check the presence of graphical > > backend and base the default on it. Or even better is to make the > > default depend

Re: grub-mkconfig fails on every non i386-pc because of gfxterm/vbe

2009-08-18 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> > I'm sorry, I'm very busy these days.  I don't know what message you are > talking about, but I still have a lot of mail to read. > > I don't insist on changing the default, as long as GRUB behaves > correctly.  I have verified that setting GRUB_TERMINAL_OUTPUT=console > in /usr/local/etc/defaul

Re: grub-mkconfig fails on every non i386-pc because of gfxterm/vbe

2009-08-18 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 08:44 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 21:09 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin: > > Quoting Felix Zielcke : > > > > >> So you would prefer something like the attached patch? > > >> Though then we'll need to tell people to explicit enable gfxterm. > > > >

Re: [PATCH] prevent duplicated entries due to symlinks

2009-08-18 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 00:20 +0200, Andreas wrote: > ping? > any problems still? I don't think anyone is really interested in that change. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin ___ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gr

Re: [GITGRUB] FB driver for EFI

2009-08-18 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
+grub_uint32_t uga_fb; +grub_uint32_t uga_pitch; + Why are these variables global? They should be either static or properly prefixed. Have you tried linux_video_setup as present in i386/linux.c in i386/efi/linux.c ? It would be nice if we could share more code between these 2 files. If it works an

pc.mod -> part_msdos.mod (etc)

2009-08-18 Thread Robert Millan
Hi, As was discussed in http://www.mail-archive.com/grub-devel@gnu.org/msg06210.html I intend to prefix all partmap modules with "part_" and rename "pc" to "part_msdos". If anyone has an objection, please say it now. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will

Re: grub-mkconfig fails on every non i386-pc because of gfxterm/vbe

2009-08-18 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 13:58 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin: > On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 08:44 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 21:09 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin: > > > Quoting Felix Zielcke : > > > > > > >> So you would prefer something like the attached patch? > > > >>

Re: [PATCH] Use common linker script for all i386-pc systems

2009-08-18 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 17:15 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > I appreciate a lot of work you put into the Apple CC support, but your > patch complicates the code a lot. All features have a maintenance > cost. Somebody will need to fix your code when it breaks. > Considering that it can only be

Re: pc.mod -> part_msdos.mod (etc)

2009-08-18 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Robert Millan wrote: > > Hi, > > As was discussed in > http://www.mail-archive.com/grub-devel@gnu.org/msg06210.html > I intend to prefix all partmap modules with "part_" and rename "pc" to > "part_msdos". > > If anyone has an objection, please say it now. size para

Re: grub-mkconfig fails on every non i386-pc because of gfxterm/vbe

2009-08-18 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 19:53 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > > > I'm sorry, I'm very busy these days. I don't know what message you are > > talking about, but I still have a lot of mail to read. > > > > I don't insist on changing the default, as long as GRUB behaves > > correctly.

Re: grub-mkconfig fails on every non i386-pc because of gfxterm/vbe

2009-08-18 Thread Michal Suchanek
2009/8/18 Felix Zielcke : > Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 13:58 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin: >> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 08:44 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: >> > Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 21:09 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin: >> > > Quoting Felix Zielcke : >> > > >> > > >> So you would prefer something l

Re: [GITGRUB] FB driver for EFI

2009-08-18 Thread Bean
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > +grub_uint32_t uga_fb; > +grub_uint32_t uga_pitch; > + > Why are these variables global? They should be either static or > properly prefixed. Hi, Yeah, I have noticed this just after pushing to repo, so I add the static prefi

Re: [PATCH] prevent duplicated entries due to symlinks

2009-08-18 Thread Michal Suchanek
2009/5/4 Andreas : > > You have a symlink named /boot/vmlinuz which points at the current kernel > version. Now you could of course find out which kernel version it's pointing > at but that version could change anytime. /boot/vmlinu[zx] and /vmlinu[zx Both are typically present on x86 and x86_64

Re: Crypto Review

2009-08-18 Thread Michael Gorven
On Tuesday 18 August 2009 18:18:31 Duboucher Thomas wrote: > Actually, I wanted to know if the code in the mercurial repository was > the same as the one in the Bazaar repository. The reason is I made > previously a patch from hg and I do not have what I need to diff the two > repositories. :| The

Re: Crypto Review

2009-08-18 Thread Duboucher Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > The Mercurial code is not up to date with the GRUB2 trunk, but is only > missing > a minor addition to the new crypto code. I've created a tarball[1] of the > latest code if that helps. > Thanks a lot! I'll check that out tomorrow. I've