Le 22/08/2021 à 21:50, Michael Schierl a écrit :
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 22:23:39 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I have on my to-do list an item to add something to the Debian release
notes about this, since that's a way to reach less-engaged users who
won't read the GRUB manual or mailing lists. That
Hello,
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 22:23:39 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I have on my to-do list an item to add something to the Debian release
notes about this, since that's a way to reach less-engaged users who
won't read the GRUB manual or mailing lists. That will likely help to
some extent, althoug
Hi all,
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:49:09AM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:22:35PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:15:53PM +0200, Daniel Kiper
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:22:35PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:15:53PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:01:01PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 24,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:22:35PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:15:53PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:01:01PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > > After some thin
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:15:53PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:01:01PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:44:52PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel
> > > wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:15:53PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:01:01PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:44:52PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:33:12PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Ma
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:01:01PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:44:52PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:33:12PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:45:27PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:50:56AM +0800, Michael Chang wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:48:01PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:16:21PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:20:00PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > > On Thu, M
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:44:52PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:33:12PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:45:27PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > rounds of security megapatches we've also seen that the amount of
> > >
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:33:12PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:45:27PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
[snip]
> > rounds of security megapatches we've also seen that the amount of
> > divergence between upstream and various distributions in
> > security-critical code is in
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:48:01PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:16:21PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:20:00PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 07:30:26PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel
> > > wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:33:12PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> How long are you going to support such systems? 1, 5 or 10 years? This
> approach makes GRUB upstream as a hostage of small MBR gaps users.
> Anyway, I think we have to make users aware that small MBR gaps are not
> supported any longe
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 01:27:15PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:37:20PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > On 3/23/21 5:16 AM, Michael Chang wrote
> > > Afterall, keeping existing running system to survive update (NOT new
> > > install) is really an important thin
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:16:21PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:20:00PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 07:30:26PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel
> > wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > NAK for this patch and others "fixing" small MBR gaps
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:45:27PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:19:06PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:16:26 +
> > Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:20:00PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > > NAK for this patch and others "
On 3/23/21 2:27 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:37:20PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> For this particular case, it might be better for distros to just revert
>> commit
>> 9e95f45ceee ("verifiers: Move verifiers API to kernel image") instead of
>> makin
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:37:20PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 3/23/21 5:16 AM, Michael Chang wrote
> > Afterall, keeping existing running system to survive update (NOT new
> > install) is really an important thing as many can't afford that to
> > happen. If we can make it any bette
On 3/23/21 5:16 AM, Michael Chang wrote
[snip]
>
> Afterall, keeping existing running system to survive update (NOT new
> install) is really an important thing as many can't afford that to
> happen. If we can make it any better to reduce the cost please consider
> to do it. It doesn't conflict w
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:20:00PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 07:30:26PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
[snip]
> NAK for this patch and others "fixing" small MBR gaps. I am not going to
> deal with this kind of issues any longer because a few folks in the
> w
On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 15:19 -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:16:26 +
> Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:20:00PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > NAK for this patch and others "fixing" small MBR gaps. I am not
> > > going to deal with this kind of issue
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:19:06PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:16:26 +
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:20:00PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > NAK for this patch and others "fixing" small MBR gaps. I am not
> > > going to deal with this kind of i
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:16:26 +
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:20:00PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > NAK for this patch and others "fixing" small MBR gaps. I am not
> > going to deal with this kind of issues any longer because a few
> > folks in the world cannot/do not want/
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:16:26PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:20:00PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > NAK for this patch and others "fixing" small MBR gaps. I am not going to
> > deal with this kind of issues any longer because a few folks in the
> > world cannot/do not
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:20:00PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> NAK for this patch and others "fixing" small MBR gaps. I am not going to
> deal with this kind of issues any longer because a few folks in the
> world cannot/do not want/... reinstall their systems. Sorry guys.
I'd just like to say th
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 07:30:26PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> Given no core functions on i386-pc would require verifiers to work and
> the only consumer of the verifier API is the pgp module, it looks good
> to me that we can move the verifiers out of the kernel image and let
> mo
Given no core functions on i386-pc would require verifiers to work and
the only consumer of the verifier API is the pgp module, it looks good
to me that we can move the verifiers out of the kernel image and let
moddep.lst to auto-load it when pgp is loaded on i386-pc platform.
This helps to reduce
27 matches
Mail list logo
