On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:16:26PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 04:20:00PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > NAK for this patch and others "fixing" small MBR gaps. I am not going to > > deal with this kind of issues any longer because a few folks in the > > world cannot/do not want/... reinstall their systems. Sorry guys. > > I'd just like to say that I think this is an unfortunate mistake, and > puts distributions in an invidious position.
Additionally, it doesn't make sense to use this argument to nack https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2021-03/msg00271.html, which merely makes error messages consistent across the codebase; I might well have done that sort of cleanup on general principles. Similarly, are you really going to refuse https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2021-03/msg00278.html merely because applying it would reduce the image size on i386-pc? (I could understand if the argument were "let's remove that code entirely rather than ifdeffing it out ...) A blanket nack policy for this sort of thing just doesn't seem to make any logical sense. -- Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org] _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
