On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:15:53PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:01:01PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:44:52PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel > > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:33:12PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:45:27PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > [snip] > > > > After some thinking it seems to me we can do this. I can take "i386-pc: > > > build verifiers API as module", "kern/misc: Move grub_printf_fmt_check > > > to gfxmenu" and similar patches into 2.06. I will revert after the > > > release all the patches which adds ifdefery or make code ugly and do not > > > benefit other platforms than i386-pc. This way you will have support for > > > small MBR gaps in 2.06 and I will have clean code after 2.06 release. > > > > > > Does it work for you guys? > > > > Does anybody care? > > Could you please consider not reverting them ? For me it is worse than > keeping them as distribution specific patch, as we will have a hard time > to explain what's going on when we have to reintroduce them in rebasing > to commits later to 2.06.
Colin, Michael, how long are you going to support small MBR gaps? Daniel _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
