On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:36:06PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> >
> > The name appleloader may be a little confusing, bootcamp seems to be a
> > better choice.
>
> How about legacyloader or even legacy?
Legacy is ambigous. Does it mean BIOS? msdos partmap? Or perhaps EFI?
--
Robert Millan
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 22:14:37 +0800
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > For some reason I have some doubts about lib/. But I do not have a
> > better name in mind either. What does belong in there? Do you
> > happen to h
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> This is a collection of miscellaneous patches, it includes:
>
> Please do not collect patches. Independant changes can better go into
> independant patches. Mails like this are
Hi,
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a collection of miscellaneous patches, it includes:
Please do not collect patches. Independant changes can better go into
independant patches. Mails like this are easily overseen and so are
important changes made by such patch.
> 1, move util/env
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 15:30 +0800, Bean wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> BTW, any comment about the other changes ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Why do we need "crc"? If there a
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 15:30 +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> BTW, any comment about the other changes ?
> >> >
> >> > Why do we need "crc"? If there are chances that it will be used for
> >> > security, we should be using SHA-1.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> BTW, any comment about the other changes ?
>> >
>> > Why do we need "crc"? If there are chances that it will be used for
>> > security, we should be using SHA-1.
>>
>> crc is useful in many place. For example, png, jffs
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 15:14 +0800, Bean wrote:
> > Fine.
>
> I'm sorry, do you mean it's fine to use bootcamp, or keep the name
> appleloader ?
Fine to use "appleloader". Actually, I've never had a chance to play
with an Intel Mac, so I don't know the details.
> >> BTW, any comment about the o
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > IMHO that even worse. Using a trademarked name like "linux" to run the
>> > trademarked software could be justified. But using a trademarked name
>> > to replace or emulate the original software is asking for a big
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 14:00 +0800, Bean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Our main repository is in Subversion, so whoever applies the patch
> > should use "svn move" to keep the contiguous file history. Unlike git,
> > which trusts the
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our main repository is in Subversion, so whoever applies the patch
> should use "svn move" to keep the contiguous file history. Unlike git,
> which trusts the contents in the first place, Subversion is more
> sensitiv
On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 12:28 +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:38:59AM +0800, Bean wrote:
> >> 4. rename appleloader command to bootcamp
> >>
> >> The name appleloader may be a little confusing, bootcamp seem
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 14:58 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> On Friday 25 July 2008, Bean wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Chris Knadle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > On Friday 25 July 2008, Bean wrote:
> > >> 4. rename appleloader command to bootcamp
> > >>
> > >> The name appleloader
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:38:59AM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> 4. rename appleloader command to bootcamp
>>
>> The name appleloader may be a little confusing, bootcamp seems to be a
>> better choice.
>
> I'm not sure if this woul
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:38:59AM +0800, Bean wrote:
> 4. rename appleloader command to bootcamp
>
> The name appleloader may be a little confusing, bootcamp seems to be a
> better choice.
I'm not sure if this would comply with Apple trademarks. What does this
command do?
--
Robert Millan
I
On Friday 25 July 2008, Bean wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Chris Knadle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Friday 25 July 2008, Bean wrote:
> >> 4. rename appleloader command to bootcamp
> >>
> >> The name appleloader may be a little confusing, bootcamp seems to be a
> >> better choice.
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Chris Knadle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 25 July 2008, Bean wrote:
>> 4. rename appleloader command to bootcamp
>>
>> The name appleloader may be a little confusing, bootcamp seems to be a
>> better choice.
>
> Rather than patching all of the content fr
On Friday 25 July 2008, Bean wrote:
> 4. rename appleloader command to bootcamp
>
> The name appleloader may be a little confusing, bootcamp seems to be a
> better choice.
Rather than patching all of the content from appleloader.c to bootcamp.c
you may want to consider doing a 'git-mv' to rena
Hi,
This is a collection of miscellaneous patches, it includes:
1, move util/envblk.c to lib/envblk.c
As envblk.c is used by module loadenv and tool grub-editenv, I think
it's better to move it to lib directory.
2. seperate hexdump function, and move it to lib/hexdump.c
hexdump module consists
19 matches
Mail list logo
