On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 14:00 +0800, Bean wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Our main repository is in Subversion, so whoever applies the patch > > should use "svn move" to keep the contiguous file history. Unlike git, > > which trusts the contents in the first place, Subversion is more > > sensitive to whatever users are telling it. > > I use git-mv to move files, which is the equivalence of "svn move". > But when I use git-diff to generate the patch, it looks as if files > are truncated. I can use git-diff -M to create a patch that shows the > renames, but it's not usable by patch.
That's why I'm asking "whoever applies the patch" to be careful. > > IMHO that even worse. Using a trademarked name like "linux" to run the > > trademarked software could be justified. But using a trademarked name > > to replace or emulate the original software is asking for a big trouble. > > > > Admittedly, I'm not a lawyer, but some people are, and it's better not > > to attract their attention. > > In fact, it doesn't replace bootcamp, it calls the service provided by > bootcamp. But anyway, it's not a big deal, I can just keep the name > appleloader. Fine. > BTW, any comment about the other changes ? Why do we need "crc"? If there are chances that it will be used for security, we should be using SHA-1. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
