On Sun 21 Sep 2014 06:38:42 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >> A good starting point may be to implement a C/C++ library function,
> >> to extract the MediaBox properties; that would open the gate to a
> >> possible pdfbb request, which gtroff.exe could process internally.
> >
> >
> > Alternatively, we c
On 21-Sep-2014 10:52:38 Deri James wrote:
> On Sun 21 Sep 2014 06:38:42 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> >> A good starting point may be to implement a C/C++ library function,
>> >> to extract the MediaBox properties; that would open the gate to a
>> >> possible pdfbb request, which gtroff.exe could proces
On 21/09/14 11:52, Deri James wrote:
> On Sun 21 Sep 2014 06:38:42 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
A good starting point may be to implement a C/C++ library function,
to extract the MediaBox properties; that would open the gate to a
possible pdfbb request, which gtroff.exe could process intern
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 03:29:18PM +0100, Keith Marshall wrote:
> >
> > Yes, it is. Someone on the list has contacted me, with a view to writing
> > the
> > code,
>
> Who might that be? If it was off-list, then we have a problem -- we all
> need to be kept in the picture, with this sort of stu
On Sun 21 Sep 2014 15:29:18 Keith Marshall wrote:
> >> Good idea!
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes, it is. Someone on the list has contacted me, with a view to writing
> > the code,
>
> Who might that be? If it was off-list, then we have a problem -- we all
> need to be kept in the picture, with this sort o
Hello Werner and all the list,
On Mon, Sep 08 2014 at 08:11:04 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> I've just pushed a new branch 'automake2' (branched from master at
>> commit 985b1eacaf24981f29bb4a5d53b8961dbafcdfef, about a month ago)
>> where I split my original work into smaller commits. It's not co
On 21/09/14 20:04, Deri James wrote:
> I'm glad that Ulrich has answered you, it was not my place to
> identify the person as they contacted me privately,
Sure, but we must strenuously discourage such private communications;
how on earth can we expect to effectively co-ordinate development, if
pot
On 21/09/14 20:50, Keith Marshall wrote:
>> I'd be happy to send you the same email I sent to Ulrich but the
>> email address;-
>>
>> Keith Marshall
>>
>> Bounces my emails
>
> Strange. It is working, but may be faulting intermittently; I'll log an
> issue with SourceForge.
https://sourc
On Thu, Sep 18 2014 at 01:41:50 AM, Dave Kemper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it an oversight that the Mission Statement section of the project
> page (http://www.gnu.org/software/groff/#mission-statement) contains
> only two of the three groff source files needed to produce the
> formatted mission statemen
Hi Robert,
On Thu, Sep 18 2014 at 05:25:40 AM, Robert Bocchino wrote:
> Attached for your review is a suggested patch to post-html.cpp. The
> motivation is that grohtml occasionally bungles the formatting of
> indented lists. Bug 30043 seems related, although that one is focused
> mainly on int
Thanks a lot for your answers Ralph, Ingo and Dale.
I got all what I need
Cheers, Greg
Le vendredi 19 septembre 2014 à 14:15 +0100, Ralph Corderoy a écrit :
> Hi Ingo,
>
> > To mitigate that situation, i think it would help a bit to include a
> > link to http://www.schaffter.ca/mom/mom-04.html
> Von: "Bertrand Garrigues"
>
> With commit a88127a4fecb307f26f2e217213d4a90e300d220 the automake2
> branch is now ready for more testing from other members of the list.
>
> git clone git://git.savannah.gnu.org/groff.git
> git checkout automake2
> ./bootstrap
> mkdir build
> cd build
> ../config
> Von: "Bertrand Garrigues"
> Then you can check in the TESTS file for the other targets. Please note
> that compared to the current build system:
> - There are 2 new targets, 'make check' and 'make distcheck'
> - Parallel build is supported.
With both checks I got an error:
1) make che
On Sep 21, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Bertrand Garrigues
wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I am not qualified to review your patch because I haven't studied
> grohtml's code, but I've tested it on the few .html files that are built
> by default in the 'doc' directory from pic.ms and webpage.ms, there are
> a few
On Sun 21 Sep 2014 20:50:37 Keith Marshall wrote:
> On 21/09/14 20:04, Deri James wrote:
> > I'm glad that Ulrich has answered you, it was not my place to
> > identify the person as they contacted me privately,
>
> Sure, but we must strenuously discourage such private communications;
> how on eart
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014, Deri James wrote:
> On Sun 21 Sep 2014 20:50:37 Keith Marshall wrote:
> > On 21/09/14 20:04, Deri James wrote:
> > > I'm glad that Ulrich has answered you, it was not my place to
> > > identify the person as they contacted me privately,
> >
> > Sure, but we must strenuously d
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014, Keith Marshall wrote:
> On 18/09/14 14:42, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> > Would an addition to the warning emitted by the macro be sufficient
> > to alert users to the potential dangers of -U?
>
> Perhaps, but it's so much better if it can be avoided altogether. FWIW,
> in my fo
Sorry not to get back on this right away. I've been away for a
couple of days--work and computer free!
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> >> I am loking for an "easy" documentation about -mom.
> >> This documentation should discribe how -mom macros are working.
>
> > Have you seen http
18 matches
Mail list logo
