On Mar 08 12:44 +, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi SGT,
>
> > latter, i want URL to appear in the table, using .UR.
>
> Can you show us the HTML for `groff -t -man -man-ext -Thtml
> sgt.tr' where sgt.tr contains
>
> Before table.
> .TS
> tab(:);
> l l.
> one:line
> T{
>
Hi SGT,
> latter, i want URL to appear in the table, using .UR.
Can you show us the HTML for `groff -t -man -man-ext -Thtml
sgt.tr' where sgt.tr contains
Before table.
.TS
tab(:);
l l.
one:line
T{
More than
.UR http://one.com
one
.UE
line
T}:with
On Mar 07 17:26 +, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Here's three lines of output from fgrep after I indicate end of file to
> tbl with Ctrl-D, shown as ^D.
>
> $ tbl | fgrep .UR
> .TS
> tab(/);
> l l.
> foo/bar
> .UR foo:///bar
> .UE
> \&.UR/as text
> .TE
> ^D
>
"SGT. Garcia" wrote:
> latter, i want URL to appear in the table, using .UR.
Why can't
T{
.UR ...
.UE
T}
be used to output the URL?
On Mar 07 17:26 +, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Here's three lines of output from fgrep after I indicate end of file to
> tbl with Ctrl-D, shown as ^D.
>
> $ tbl | fgrep .UR
> .TS
> tab(/);
> l l.
> foo/bar
> .UR foo:///bar
> .UE
> \&.UR/as text
> .TE
> ^D
>
"SGT. Garcia" wrote:
> sorry for being too short. in the following (abbreviated) .UR can not be
> used out side of the T{...T} block. or else it's interpreted literally:
What is the problem of the T{...T} block? It works--so why don't you want to
use this solution?
Hi SGT,
> > You can use the zero-width space character \& to stop `.' being at
> > the start of a line, e.g.
> >
> > \&.UR foo:///bar
> > \&.UE
>
> hello Ralph, do you mean this?
>
> 2014-2015::T{
> It is neither this nor that while it's both this and that
> T}:
> \&.UR http://example.com
On Mar 07 15:36 +, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> You can use the zero-width space character \& to stop `.' being at the
> start of a line, e.g.
>
> \&.UR foo:///bar
> \&.UE
>
> Cheers, Ralph.
hello Ralph,
do you mean this?
2014-2015::T{
It is neither this nor that while it's both this an
Hi SGT,
> in the following (abbreviated) .UR can not be used out side of the
> T{...T} block. or else it's interpreted literally:
>
> .mso man.tmac
> .fam A
> .ps -4
> .vs -4
> .TH Résumé CS
> .TS
> tab(:) center;
> l l l l.
> 2014-2015::T{
> It is neither this nor that while it's both this and t
On Mar 04 20:29 -0800, Dale Snell wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:41:12 -0500, in message
> 20150304234112.GC654@vpn.5665sherbrooke.house, SGT. Garcia wrote:
>
> > short of wrapping text in a text blocks i can't use any of the macros
> > in man.tmoc; in particular .UR/.UE and .MT/ME. is this inten
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:41:12 -0500, in message
20150304234112.GC654@vpn.5665sherbrooke.house, SGT. Garcia wrote:
> short of wrapping text in a text blocks i can't use any of the macros
> in man.tmoc; in particular .UR/.UE and .MT/ME. is this intended
> behaviour?
I'm afraid I don't understand what
hello,
short of wrapping text in a text blocks i can't use any of the macros in
man.tmoc; in particular .UR/.UE and .MT/ME. is this intended behaviour?
12 matches
Mail list logo
