Re: [Groff] Google+

2012-04-19 Thread Keith Marshall
On 18/04/12 21:01, James K. Lowden wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:02:59 -0400 > Peter Schaffter wrote: > >> It is true that the signal-to-noise ratio on the list is zero, which >> might not be the case with Google+. > > Surely you mean "approaches 1", not 0? Not that I'm helping I hope no

Re: [Groff] Google+

2012-04-18 Thread Ted Harding
On 18-Apr-2012 20:01:40 James K. Lowden wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:02:59 -0400 > Peter Schaffter wrote: > >> It is true that the signal-to-noise ratio on the list is zero, which >> might not be the case with Google+. > > Surely you mean "approaches 1", not 0? Not that I'm helping > >

Re: [Groff] Google+

2012-04-18 Thread James K. Lowden
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:02:59 -0400 Peter Schaffter wrote: > It is true that the signal-to-noise ratio on the list is zero, which > might not be the case with Google+. Surely you mean "approaches 1", not 0? Not that I'm helping --jkl

Re: [Groff] Google+

2012-04-18 Thread Mike Bianchi
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 03:02:59PM -0400, Peter Schaffter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012, Doug McIlroy wrote: > > In my opinion, it would be sad to see discussions about > > groff pulled inside the gates of a social network. I would > > hope that little of general interest has migrated there. > > I

Re: [Groff] Google+

2012-04-18 Thread Peter Schaffter
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012, Doug McIlroy wrote: > In my opinion, it would be sad to see discussions about > groff pulled inside the gates of a social network. I would > hope that little of general interest has migrated there. It is true that the signal-to-noise ratio on the list is zero, which might not

Re: [Groff] Google+

2012-04-18 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Doug, > In my opinion, it would be sad to see discussions about groff pulled > inside the gates of a social network. I would hope that little of > general interest has migrated there. Sorry, I should have been more clear. I agree. I wouldn't expect to see troff discussion migrate there, just

Re: [Groff] Google+

2012-04-18 Thread Doug McIlroy
In my opinion, it would be sad to see discussions about groff pulled inside the gates of a social network. I would hope that little of general interest has migrated there. Doug

[Groff] Google+.

2012-04-18 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi, Just wondering how many troffers are on Google+; might be you post some interesting stuff. I thought if you reply just to me off-list with your URL, or share a `private' post with me, I'll build up a circle and then share it to itself in a while all so you can add some or all of its members.