On 18-Apr-2012 20:01:40 James K. Lowden wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:02:59 -0400 > Peter Schaffter <pe...@schaffter.ca> wrote: > >> It is true that the signal-to-noise ratio on the list is zero, which >> might not be the case with Google+. > > Surely you mean "approaches 1", not 0? Not that I'm helping.... > > --jkl
Let me help ... IxHUBnrPmuSCFrrURlPkpvhRDghbPCfJuuVQtRKnetWeqfdffE NXTVxkVTWuKaymQHgvSxGwgRAQVLtXVGlOMwZXFGqzgJvcCWto xNvaXrvnsPmKzWOHXTpwXWYwYZMcfkuECpkCPggGrYAWAUUfad UePSGaWtnXseTygfUOiHgwYpWAeROlkrorQmEekABhzNANAzat Ted. ------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <ted.hard...@wlandres.net> Date: 18-Apr-2012 Time: 21:51:36 This message was sent by XFMail -------------------------------------------------
