On 18/04/12 21:01, James K. Lowden wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:02:59 -0400 > Peter Schaffter <pe...@schaffter.ca> wrote: > >> It is true that the signal-to-noise ratio on the list is zero, which >> might not be the case with Google+. > > Surely you mean "approaches 1", not 0? Not that I'm helping....
I hope not! A signal to noise ratio of 1 means noise amplitude equal to signal amplitude, (i.e. each at 50%). The ideal is signal --> 100%; noise --> 0%, so signal / noise --> infinity. We're normally close to that ideal, but I guess this thread is becoming prejudicial to that. -- Regards, Keith.