On 18/04/12 21:01, James K. Lowden wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:02:59 -0400
> Peter Schaffter <pe...@schaffter.ca> wrote:
> 
>> It is true that the signal-to-noise ratio on the list is zero, which
>> might not be the case with Google+.
> 
> Surely you mean "approaches 1", not 0?  Not that I'm helping....

I hope not!  A signal to noise ratio of 1 means noise amplitude equal to
signal amplitude, (i.e. each at 50%).  The ideal is signal --> 100%;
noise --> 0%, so signal / noise --> infinity.

We're normally close to that ideal, but I guess this thread is becoming
prejudicial to that.

-- 
Regards,
Keith.

Reply via email to