Hello,
anyone made debian-packages for lenny of groff 1.21?
I'm struggling with makefile-hardcoded pathes for xditview and other
glitches.
:wq! PoC
Hello Ralph! Hello troffers!
A copy of this mail is sent to the groff-list, because it may be of general
interest.
[ref. http://www.troff.org/pubs.html]
While I browsed through some documentation, I discovered that a whole set of
manuals was produced with troff:
(1) OSF/Motif: User's Guid
As the title says: A new option `-j' is now available to groff to call
the `chem' preprocessor.
Werner
> It seems that the man page for the contributed mom macro package
> (groff_mom(7)) shows an incorrect path to the examples; see supplied
> patch.
Fixed, thanks; the path to the HTML documentation was incorrect, too.
Werner
Hello troffers!
It seems that the man page for the contributed mom macro package (groff_mom(7))
shows an incorrect path to the examples; see supplied patch.
--- groff-1.21/contrib/mom/groff_mom.man2010-12-31 08:33:09.0
+0100
+++ groff-1.21/contrib/mom/groff_mom.man.fixed 2011-
> "If the optional second argument to de is present it is used
> as the macro closure request instead of `..'"
Applied, thanks. Kudos to all who have given a helping hand.
Werner
On Saturday 22 Jan 2011 11:25:58 Ted Harding wrote:
> On 22-Jan-11 11:03:47, Deri James wrote:
> > On Saturday 22 Jan 2011 09:54:45 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >> >> "The optional second argument to de changes this to a macro to
> >> >>
> >> >> ¡.end¢."
> >> >>
> >> >> For me this sentence i
On 22-Jan-11 11:03:47, Deri James wrote:
> On Saturday 22 Jan 2011 09:54:45 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> >> "The optional second argument to de changes this to a macro to
>> >>
>> >> ¡.end¢."
>> >>
>> >> For me this sentence is difficult to understand, although the
>> >> meaning is obvious.
On Saturday 22 Jan 2011 09:54:45 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >>"The optional second argument to de changes this to a macro to
> >>
> >> ‘.end’."
> >>
> >> For me this sentence is difficult to understand, although the
> >> meaning is obvious.
> >
> > It was the same thing for me, I couldn
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >>"The optional second argument to de changes this to a macro to
> >> ‘.end’."
> >>
> Any improvement in the wording is highly welcomed.
It's quite not easy for me, but let's try this:
"If a second argument is given to de (for exemple .de name end),
>> "The optional second argument to de changes this to a macro to
>> ‘.end’."
>>
>> For me this sentence is difficult to understand, although the
>> meaning is obvious.
>
> It was the same thing for me, I couldn't exactly understand this
> until I saw examples in om.tmac.
Any improveme
Ralph Graulich wrote:
> "The optional second argument to de changes this to a macro to ‘.end’."
>
> For me this sentence is difficult to understand, although the meaning is
> obvious.
It was the same thing for me, I couldn't exactly
understand this until I saw examples in om.tmac.
But I'
12 matches
Mail list logo
