On 22-Jan-11 11:03:47, Deri James wrote: > On Saturday 22 Jan 2011 09:54:45 Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> >> "The optional second argument to de changes this to a macro to >> >> >> >> ¡.end¢." >> >> >> >> For me this sentence is difficult to understand, although the >> >> meaning is obvious. >> > >> > It was the same thing for me, I couldn't exactly understand this >> > until I saw examples in om.tmac. >> >> Any improvement in the wording is highly welcomed. >> >> >> Werner > > Well, I'm welsh! How about:- > > "If the optional second argument to de is present it is used > as the macro closure command instead of `..'" > > Cheers > Deri
Iechyd da! That looks good. I'd perhaps suggest "request" rather than "command" (in line with basic groff terminology): "If the optional second argument to de is present it is used as the macro closure request instead of `..'" Ted (Saesneg). -------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <ted.hard...@wlandres.net> Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861 Date: 22-Jan-11 Time: 11:25:54 ------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
