On Saturday 22 Jan 2011 11:25:58 Ted Harding wrote: > On 22-Jan-11 11:03:47, Deri James wrote: > > On Saturday 22 Jan 2011 09:54:45 Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> >> "The optional second argument to de changes this to a macro to > >> >> > >> >> ¡.end¢." > >> >> > >> >> For me this sentence is difficult to understand, although the > >> >> meaning is obvious. > >> > > >> > It was the same thing for me, I couldn't exactly understand this > >> > until I saw examples in om.tmac. > >> > >> Any improvement in the wording is highly welcomed. > >> > >> Werner > > > > Well, I'm welsh! How about:- > > > > "If the optional second argument to de is present it is used > > as the macro closure command instead of `..'" > > > > Cheers > > Deri > > Iechyd da! That looks good. I'd perhaps suggest "request" rather > than "command" (in line with basic groff terminology): > > "If the optional second argument to de is present it is used > as the macro closure request instead of `..'" > > Ted (Saesneg).
Bore da Ted, Yes, much better. Deri (not a true welsh speaker - just ok for swearing!)
