On Monday, June 15, 2015 at 6:25:54 AM UTC+6, B Galliart wrote:
> contributors will have to reverse engineer from the code what the new private
> calls do.
I just want to point that according to the Pocket(tm) Terms of Service[1]:
> LICENSE RESTRICTIONS
>
> Your access to and use of the Pocket T
Let's talk about other principle of The Mozilla Manifesto - number 8[1]:
> Transparent community-based processes promote participation, accountability
> and trust.
On Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 6:34:01 AM UTC+6, Sheeri Cabral wrote:
> Do you know the conditions Mozilla is in, such that in this ca
On Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 9:30:24 AM UTC+6, Sheeri Cabral wrote:
> Many answers were given. To say there's been no explanation feels to me like
> there's been a lot of talking and not a lot of listening to the responses.
> It *was* explained over replies in the past few weeks, but not accepted
On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 at 12:39:38 PM UTC+6, Ryan Kelly wrote:
> I directly challenged you to explain how the Pocket Terms of Service are
> supposedly activated at install time, how they supposedly apply to every
> Firefox user regardless of whether they interacted with the Pocket
> button at
On Monday, July 6, 2015 at 10:23:22 PM UTC+6, Gervase Markham wrote:
> You can accept my assurance that the Pocket TOS do not prevent you using
> Pocket in a commercial environment; or you can wait for what I hope will
> be a more formal reply to the points raised in this thread in a few days.
>
>
On Tuesday, July 7, 2015 at 6:08:25 PM UTC+6, Gervase Markham wrote:
> "Commercial use" in this context basically means "selling the service".
> It does not mean "using it as an individual user in the course of your
> business".
Disclaimer: once again I'm confused by your wording, Gerv. (It's like
On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 at 5:05:47 PM UTC+6, tbel...@gmail.com wrote:
> It really seems that with all of the questions about the TOS and proprietary
> technology, Mozilla Manefesto number 04 comes into play here, and 08 has been
> completely ignored.
>
> Remove it for now, get the answers to
On Wednesday, July 15, 2015 at 12:30:08 AM UTC+6, Urmika Devi wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is Mika from Mozilla's legal team. Some concerns have been raised here
> around the scope and application of Pocket's ToS and Privacy Policy in
> connection with Firefox. I'm writing to provide more in
On Friday, December 18, 2015 at 10:06:03 AM UTC+6, Eric Shepherd wrote:
> This is quite interesting; I for one find it remarkably convenient. That
> said, however, I was already a Pocket user before this integration occurred.
You're biased, aren't you? Your opinion barely could be extrapolated to a
On Friday, December 18, 2015 at 1:37:22 PM UTC+6, Francesco Lodolo [:flod]
wrote:
> I don't think looking at 90 days is fair. Let's look at 7 days, at least
> there's something manageable
> https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/?q=pocket&date_start=2015-12-10&selected=7d
This is not how statistics work
10 matches
Mail list logo
