On Tuesday, July 7, 2015 at 6:08:25 PM UTC+6, Gervase Markham wrote: > "Commercial use" in this context basically means "selling the service". > It does not mean "using it as an individual user in the course of your > business".
Disclaimer: once again I'm confused by your wording, Gerv. (It's like you do it intentionally to confuse us, haha). I wrote the following message in assumption that by "selling the service" you meant "sub-licensing THE Pocket(tm) service" and not "making money by providing any other profitable service (as activity) that includes any use of Pocket(tm)". If so... I'm sorry, Gerv, but I don't buy it. "Selling the service" (aka "sub-licensing") is indeed included in "commercial use" activity variations, but "commercial use" is not limited to just "sub-licensing". Unless it defined explicitly in Pocket(tm) ToS, I see no reason to not think of "commercial use" definition in general way as "any use that is a part of revenue generating activity, that is, making money". > As I said, all Firefox users can use Pocket in any context. So you're basically saying that any Firefox user is allowed to, for example: (1) teach other people how to use Pocket(tm) and take money for this; (2) get paid for showing to someone their list of pages saved in Pocket(tm); (3) get paid for just using Pocket(tm); and so on. Am I wrong? P.S.: Please don't think of me as of some kind of troll, I'm just confused in the whole situation and eager to find out the truth. _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
