Re: Super-review - proposal to remove given lack of super-review-specific usage

2020-02-03 Thread nevermoreeverytingsat1231--- via governance
On Friday, July 28, 2017 at 11:25:19 PM UTC+6:30, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: > (x-post platform + governance + bmo, please followup-to governance) > > Today I was asked for super-review. Although I've been around a while, I > am not a super-reviewer. I can't remember the last time before today > tha

Re: Super-review - proposal to remove given lack of super-review-specific usage

2018-08-17 Thread mcote--- via governance
Responding to an old thread here... I am currently in the process of updating a number of MDN pages to cover Phabricator (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1444791 if anyone wants to follow along). Although the page on www.mozilla.org is still up, it seems that there's a pretty soli

Re: Super-review - proposal to remove given lack of super-review-specific usage

2017-07-30 Thread Edmund Wong via governance
Emma Humphries wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks to Gijs for bringing this up and to everyone for their responses so > far. I'm always down for removing obsolete metadata from BMO. > > I want to hear back from NSS and Mail/Thunderbird/Sea Monkey on this before > I remove this. The only super reviewer we h

Re: Super-review - proposal to remove given lack of super-review-specific usage

2017-07-28 Thread R Kent James via governance
On 7/28/2017 2:06 PM, Emma Humphries wrote: I want to hear back from NSS and Mail/Thunderbird/Sea Monkey on this before I remove this. Thunderbird has no super-review requirement, so if there has been any usage of this it fits the pattern previously noted of really being a request for a secon

Re: Super-review - proposal to remove given lack of super-review-specific usage

2017-07-28 Thread Eric Rescorla via governance
FWIW, I think NSS could get by just fine w/o superreview. -Ekr On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Emma Humphries wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks to Gijs for bringing this up and to everyone for their responses so > far. I'm always down for removing obsolete metadata from BMO. > > I want to hear back fro

Re: Super-review - proposal to remove given lack of super-review-specific usage

2017-07-28 Thread Emma Humphries via governance
Hi, Thanks to Gijs for bringing this up and to everyone for their responses so far. I'm always down for removing obsolete metadata from BMO. I want to hear back from NSS and Mail/Thunderbird/Sea Monkey on this before I remove this. I'd ask this discussion remain open until close of business on T

Re: Super-review - proposal to remove given lack of super-review-specific usage

2017-07-28 Thread Dave Townsend via governance
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:09 AM Ehsan Akhgari via governance < governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote: > On 07/28/2017 01:04 PM, L. David Baron via governance wrote: > > On Friday 2017-07-28 17:54 +0100, Gijs Kruitbosch via governance wrote: > >> I therefore propose 2 things: > >> 1) we remove the s

Re: Super-review - proposal to remove given lack of super-review-specific usage

2017-07-28 Thread Ehsan Akhgari via governance
On 07/28/2017 01:04 PM, L. David Baron via governance wrote: On Friday 2017-07-28 17:54 +0100, Gijs Kruitbosch via governance wrote: I therefore propose 2 things: 1) we remove the super-review flag from Core/Firefox/Toolkit, or perhaps everything except maybe NSS (on the assumption it is activel

Re: Super-review - proposal to remove given lack of super-review-specific usage

2017-07-28 Thread Gregory Szorc via governance
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch via governance < governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote: > (x-post platform + governance + bmo, please followup-to governance) > > Today I was asked for super-review. Although I've been around a while, I > am not a super-reviewer. I can't remember the

Re: Super-review - proposal to remove given lack of super-review-specific usage

2017-07-28 Thread L. David Baron via governance
On Friday 2017-07-28 17:54 +0100, Gijs Kruitbosch via governance wrote: > I therefore propose 2 things: > 1) we remove the super-review flag from Core/Firefox/Toolkit, or perhaps > everything except maybe NSS (on the assumption it is actively used there). Agreed. > 2) we either remove or in some