FWIW, I think NSS could get by just fine w/o superreview. -Ekr
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Emma Humphries <e...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks to Gijs for bringing this up and to everyone for their responses so > far. I'm always down for removing obsolete metadata from BMO. > > I want to hear back from NSS and Mail/Thunderbird/Sea Monkey on this > before I remove this. > > I'd ask this discussion remain open until close of business on Thursday > the 3rd of August, and then I'll ask the BMO admins to take action. > > I don't hear otherwise, I will open a bug in bmo::adminstration to have > the flag removed from all products/components, and otherwise I'll specify > it be removed from Core/FFx/Toolkit. > > I'll open a bug to have https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/ > about/governance/policies/reviewers/ archived. > > Emma Humphries > Bugmaster, Firefox Product Integrity > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Dave Townsend via governance < > governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:09 AM Ehsan Akhgari via governance < >> governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote: >> >> > On 07/28/2017 01:04 PM, L. David Baron via governance wrote: >> > > On Friday 2017-07-28 17:54 +0100, Gijs Kruitbosch via governance >> wrote: >> > >> I therefore propose 2 things: >> > >> 1) we remove the super-review flag from Core/Firefox/Toolkit, or >> perhaps >> > >> everything except maybe NSS (on the assumption it is actively used >> > there). >> > > Agreed. >> > >> > I agree as well. >> > >> >> For Firefox and Toolkit I certainly approve of this. >> >> >> 2) we either remove or in some obvious way mark the above-linked >> > >> super-review document as out of date / archived / historical, and >> > remove any >> > >> links such as may exist from documentation/mdn that point to that >> page. >> > > I'd be in favor of marking it as historical. >> > I think this whole page should be moved to >> > http://www-archive.mozilla.org/ for historical purposes. That page has >> > has zero relevance on our development practices for a long time. >> > >> >> I agree . >> _______________________________________________ >> governance mailing list >> governance@lists.mozilla.org >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance >> > > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
