+1
Thanks for the lesson!
Em sexta-feira, 31 de maio de 2019 13:44:55 UTC-3, Devon H. O'Dell escreveu:
>
> Maybe this story about suggesting the murder of a colleague is supposed to
> be a tongue-in-cheek joke, but I want to push back heavily against it. And
> I’m sorry that this is devolving si
Maybe this story about suggesting the murder of a colleague is supposed to
be a tongue-in-cheek joke, but I want to push back heavily against it. And
I’m sorry that this is devolving significantly from the original topic, but
I don’t think this should slide by.
Though my professional experience is
A quick search of the USPTO trademarks database reveals:
[image: Mark Image]
*Word Mark * GO
*Goods and Services* IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G & S: Computer
programs and downloadable computer programs that implement a computer
programming language for use in developing, building and manag
Watch out, you must not mention java here - at a minimum spell it with
lowercase so you can pretend you were talking about coffee :)
> On May 29, 2019, at 6:55 AM, JuciÊ Andrade wrote:
>
> Registering Go as a trademark is important to protect it against improper use.
> Let's not forget "Sun vs
Registering Go as a trademark is important to protect it against improper
use.
Let's not forget "Sun vs Microsoft" fighting to define what could be named
"Java".
https://www.zdnet.com/article/sun-vs-microsoft-clash-of-the-titans-5000121284/
On Friday, May 24, 2019 at 3:49:18 AM UTC-3, Rob 'Comm
It is very good to have registered the marks to prevent abuse. Once owned,
the owner then has the ability to share as freely as desired, but in a
structured way (a la open source licenses) while holding questionable uses
at bay.
In my work this kind of control has demonstrated its importance. In t
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:49 AM Rob Pike wrote:
>
> If that's true - and it might well not be - it's a surprise to me. When
> launching the language we explicitly made sure NOT to trademark it.
>
Go appears to be trademarked, as well as the new design of the Go
logo. Golang doesn't seem to be.
On Fri, 24 May 2019 01:30:02 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>Well, the two enries are listed at the given URI, quite far apart and in
>the opposite order.
The list is alphabetical.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from t
Well, the two enries are listed at the given URI, quite far apart and in
the opposite order.
Could be a mistake or a bureaucratic glitch.
Lucio.
On Friday, 24 May 2019 08:49:18 UTC+2, Rob 'Commander' Pike wrote:
>
> If that's true - and it might well not be - it's a surprise to me. When
> laun
If that's true - and it might well not be - it's a surprise to me. When
launching the language we explicitly made sure NOT to trademark it.
-rob
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:50 AM Gerald Henriksen
wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2019 07:40:52 +1000, you wrote:
>
> >The last sentence of the article is no
On Fri, 24 May 2019 07:40:52 +1000, you wrote:
>The last sentence of the article is not correct. The name Go is not
>trademarked by Google, at least as a programming language trademark. There
>are other things Google makes called Go (an interesting signal on its own)
>and they might be trademarked
On Fri, 24 May 2019 07:40:52 +1000, you wrote:
>The last sentence of the article is not correct. The name Go is not
>trademarked by Google, at least as a programming language trademark. There
>are other things Google makes called Go (an interesting signal on its own)
>and they might be trademarked
The last sentence of the article is not correct. The name Go is not
trademarked by Google, at least as a programming language trademark. There
are other things Google makes called Go (an interesting signal on its own)
and they might be trademarked, but Go the language is not a trademark.
-rob
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
