I have found some errors (not properly communicating size changes in the
Setattr response), but these do not fix the problem.
The Setattr method is now
// Setattr satisfies the bazil.org/fuse/fs.NodeSetattrer interface.
func (f *RW) Setattr(ctx context.Context, req *fuse.SetattrRequest, resp
*fu
Can someone tell me what it is that I'm failing to understand with file
truncation/write and FUSE?
The issue is demonstrated here with this code (exerted from [1] in
sisyphus_test.go):
f, err := os.OpenFile(fusemountedfilename, os.O_RDWR|os.O_CREATE, 0666)
if err != nil {
log.Fatalf("unex
On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 13:47 -0700, nicolas riesch wrote:
> In your original example, if you don't cast, it works.
>
> https://play.golang.org/p/g-GScYkA5S
That is not doing what the OP wanted though; they wanted a []int.
https://play.golang.org/p/YpyYXIu9D2
> The explanation is here:
>
> http
On 09/05/2016 12:14 AM, Jason E. Aten wrote:
Or perhaps it is because sync.WaitGroup and sync.Cond (condition
variables) exist. They
aren't select{}-friendly, but they usually do the job.
Yes they aren't select{}-friendly. sync.Cond for example looks like
right choice but just blocks.
--
Ok I'll file an issue to start with.
On Sunday, 4 September 2016 18:19:10 UTC+1, bradfitz wrote:
>
> Yeah, that'd be a fine cleanup. Want to send a change?
>
> I believe a similar cleanup happened to the net.Conn type a number of
> releases ago.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Sridhar >
I've often had similar thoughts.
Getting started with Go, a barrier synchronizer
that played nice with channels seems like a natural
idea.
But there's not one as far as I know.
Perhaps that's because it's not difficult to build one. Or
because it puts the cleanup onus on the garbage collector.
I've often had similar thoughts.
Getting started with Go, a barrier synchronizer
that played nice with channels seems like natural
a natural.
But there's not one as far as I know.
Perhaps that's because it's not difficult to build one. Or
because it puts the cleanup onus on the garbage collect
Does anyone have any thoughts on whether it would be feasible/desirable to
be able to report allocs/op as a decimal in benchmarks? There must be many
small functions out there which allocate at uneven, sub b.N, rates.
Currently they are hidden/hard to reason about.
On Sunday, 4 September 2016 2
Thanks Peter,
Your observation cracked the mystery for me. There were two things that
were causing me confusion.
1: That we were not observing any allocations at all, even though the map/s
must be allocating.
2: That one of these tests would allocate anything at all, while the other
allocates
On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 8:09:09 AM UTC+3, Dave Cheney wrote:
>
> Your not seeding the random generator so the results should be identical
> each time.
Thanks, added rand.Seed(time.Now().Unix()) and now I see a better
distribution.
--
You received this message because you are subscribe
Yeah, that'd be a fine cleanup. Want to send a change?
I believe a similar cleanup happened to the net.Conn type a number of
releases ago.
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Sridhar
wrote:
> The os.File type is re-defined across multiple files under src/os for os
> specific builds.
>
> Can this
If you start in a separate repo, make sure you are checking CLAs all along
the way (I can help you set that up if needed). Otherwise, any move into
/x/image just becomes that much more difficult.
And yes, I would definitely start with the standard Go license.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:28 AM, Nig
http://github.com/xlab/pocketsphinx-go
Hello. A reddit user has asked if there are any options for offline speech
recognition for Golang, so I did a quick research and was surprised that
thing like CMU Sphinx[1] has no Go bindings yet. That's a legendary
framework and it continues to improve ev
Thank you for your replies.
David
Le dimanche 4 septembre 2016 00:21:18 UTC+2, David Sofo a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a set of ElasticSearch queries in string format already. I don't
> have to rewrite the queries. How to query ElasticSearch using these strings.
> A string query can have this fo
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 1:23 PM, wrote:
> This is consistent: https://play.golang.org/p/G-vXEBc1Ab
Correct. Getting time in Playground returns constant output usually:
Its RPC also does some sort of caching so it won't work for running
time dependent tests like these:
https://play.golang.org/p/u
(re-sending because I replied privately by mistake)
> oju...@gmail.com writes:
> > I know I am not so polite as my mother wished I was, but please
> > tell me why would one feel obligated to ask permission for adding
> > a URL to a site? As long as you only reproduce a lead text you
> > wouldn't h
On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 10:09:09 PM UTC-7, Dave Cheney wrote:
>
> Your not seeding the random generator so the results should be identical
> each time.
Except that the random numbers are being assigned in goroutines that are
racing each other. On my system, at least one of the two go
17 matches
Mail list logo
