after "permitted
by law" and as a result my program does the same.
I'm sure someone on the FreePascal forums will provide some help
assuming they have experience but I kind of get the impression that
TProcess is a bit of a 'black art' so I thought I would ask here as
wel
in cheek.
Best
Keith
On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 11:03 -0800, Daniel H. Werner wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> I hope someone can give me some advice.
> I have been a Mac user for years (and years!) and used PGP most of
> that time. I was running v. 9.7.1 when I upgraded my old G5 to
if that comes across as being facetious. The more random you
are as a human and the faster you do more random things as a human the
faster the entropy arises.
Best
Keith
On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 15:27 -0400, Fabian Santiago wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i have centos 7.2.x
>
> gpg v2.0.22
>
s...'
I'm not proud and I am not going to get upset if you decide I am the
wrong person for the job.
Offer's there anyway.
Keith
On Fri, 2016-03-25 at 22:24 +, Keith Mallen wrote:
> I'm a noob. I'm drunk. I'll try. What do you want?
>
> ..ulterior mot
ice and gather your thoughts in order to present your concerns,
should you have any, and voice them.
This UK legislation will have impact elsewhere.
Regards
Keith
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
.. I should really sort out which e-mails I have a clue about..
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 16:30 +0100, Steve Karmeinsky wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 03:38:18PM +0100, keith wrote:
>
> > This UK legislation will have impact elsewhere.
>
> Currently encryption isn't
On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 00:48 +0100, Steve Karmeinsky wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 11:15:47PM +0100, MFPA wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> > On Wednesday 4 May 2016 at 6:04:55 PM, in
> > , keith wrote:
> > > Personally I
have found that compressing/decompressing a bunch
of files whilst the keys are being generated helps things along
immensely. I also remember someone on the list mentioning a process or
piece of software that performed a similar task but unfortunately I do
not remember the name of it.
HTH
Keith
O
e about missing
a ??.so.XX it is usually the case that the require file is
called ??.so.YY and there is a missing Symbolic Link
Symbolic link to shared library and the library itself. I'm sure my
computer is not up to date...
Keith
___
Gnupg-
would seem that if you can get
access to the command line interface for GPG in a similar manner then,
being naive, it could be a solution
Just floating one
Keith
On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 13:55 +, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> > On 22 Mar 2016, at 10:40, Paolo Bolzoni
> > wrote:
>
I'm a noob. I'm drunk. I'll try. What do you want?
..ulterior motive is I might learn.
Keith
On Fri, 2016-03-25 at 20:50 +, listo factor wrote:
> On 03/22/2016 09:21 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
>
> > ... writing good documentation is hard, very hard. In
> > fa
Hello,
Is the pgp from pgp.com compatible with gnupg ??
Is gnupg FIPS 140-2 compliant?
Dave
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
? If so could you
post an example of the executable and arguments used?
Thanks,
Keith
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ist? Did I miss something in the docs? Is
there a workaround?
TIA
--
Keith Hellman #include
[EMAIL PROTECTED]from disclaimer import standard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-*-
a benefit of easily managing the
signatures I want my script to accept, without cluttering up my
script will silly whose-signed-this-thing logic. I just import or
remove the appropriate public keys from ./my_signature's database.
Cheers.
--
Keith Hellman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[Tries using Firegpg to create a reply]
Enigmail version 0.95.7 (20080808)
Firefox Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9)
Gecko/2008052906 Firefox/3.0
Firegpg 0.5.2
Gmail set to plain formatting
Guessing bet 10 to 1 signature fails
O
16 matches
Mail list logo
