are in the 21st
century and still learned to not use full quotes and top posting. The
first time I realized that proper e-mail style is useful was when I
started to read more mailinglists with rather high message volumes – you
just can keep a better overview with "correct" quoting
> gpg --edit-key (newguyskey)
> revsig
> save
You forgot gpg --send-keys (newguyskey) and the fact that signatures on
a key are actually ment as a statement that the signer has checked the
key owner's identity and not as a sign that someone belongs
n
keys. AFAIK there is no option for automatically retrieving all keys
that signed a key.
Martin
pgpdllQz5x3kk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
e will encrypt
messages to the correct subkey *only*).
[1] http://wiki.fsfe.org/Card_howtos/Card_with_subkeys_using_backups
HTH
Martin
pgpyI3xccVju7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
e subkeys is
being stored.
I hope this is helpful for you, but if you have any questions, don't
hesitate to ask :-)
[1] http://wiki.fsfe.org/Card_howtos/Card_with_subkeys_using_backups
All the best,
Martin
pgpXsATuoRUfj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
before we generate or import a key.
This sounds like a good reason for what I experienced. If I find the
time, I'll try it out and maybe switch to bigger subkeys.
Martin
pgpX6wvLb0jKs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg
ader/udev-howto-automatization.sh
[2] http://wiki.fsfe.org/Card_howtos/Card_with_subkeys_using_backups
Thanks,
Martin
pgpQL52J0RIqZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
I issued the following command to receive my own public key for my other mail
address "m.ja...@gmx.net".
gpg --keyserver sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys D870A352
and got the following output
gpg: requesting key D870A352 from hkp server sks-keyservers.net
gpg: key D870A352: &qu
* Robert Holtzman [111018 21:43,
mID <20111018185035.gb4...@cox.net>]:
> The greatest hindrance to widespread adoption is the phrase I often
> hear..."I've got nothing to hide" It drives me up a wall.
+1
Martin
smime.p7s
Description: S/M
Hello all,
I'm interested in learning more about how cryptography is applied, and
I'm trying to understand the file formats used by Gnupg. The RFC4880
has been a great help. In looking at an private key I can find the
MPI's for the public and private parameters. In looking at a
ciphertext, I can f
ed
> PINs and passphrase, but it results in the error above.
>
> It is likely I'm doing something wrong, but am not sure what... if
> someone has any clues, it is appreciated if you can point me in the
> right direction.
Even v2 cards can't carry 4096 Bit keys. The maximum
you gave me at FSCONS back in 2009
states that 3072 Bits is the maximum key size. I use 2048 Bit keys at
the moment since back then I even had problems with 3072 Bit Keys.
> I just tried 3072 bits and it worked. Thanks!
Hehe, no problem :-)
All the best,
Martin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
Hello all,
I've been playing around with encrypted files, trying to decrypt them
independently. I've used Maple to decrypt the RSA, and openssl to
decrypt the AES, sha1sum to verify the hashes, but I'm having problems
with the compressed files. I (perhaps naively) thought that once I'd
undone the
when verifying the
signature in mutt. I'm not entirely sure, but I think the problem has to
do with the encoding. I'm not very talented in shell scripting, so any
help is highly appreciated. Of course if you know a way to send
automated PGP/MIME signed messages, that would be even better
cate this.. Or has "PGP" some sort of special
fingerprint which is understood by server-side software? Last but not
least, are there any other types besides "PGP"? I guess it is as pgpdump is
even able to dump the timestamp when the k
vate key fingerprints remained the same. So the key
fingerprint is a hashed key material? Is it a SHA-1, MD5 or some other
type of hash?
regards,
Martin
2013/8/2, David Shaw :
> On Aug 1, 2013, at 6:58 PM, Martin T wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> RIPE(RIR in European region) datab
private key
with his personal public key from the key server and send the
encrypted private key to his e-mail? This method doesn't require
shipping the USB memory stick. Better ideas?
regards,
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.o
hen
has to send the private key and password protecting the private key to
me.
regards,
Martin
2013/8/2, NdK :
> Il 02/08/2013 12:51, Martin T ha scritto:
>
> [...]
>> shipping the USB memory stick. Better ideas?
> It's a wrong thing from the start.
> Let the user generate
. Finally I encrypt
the project private key with his public key and e-mail this encrypted
private key to him. Once he confirms that he has received the project
private key, I will delete the project private key from my machine as
I do not need it any more. Is that what you meant?
regards,
Martin
201
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ||
noc@T42 ~/.gnupg $
regards,
Martin
On 8/2/13, David Shaw wrote:
> On Aug 2, 2013, at 3:56 AM, Martin T wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for the reply!
>>
>>>> I think "method"
data, I do not see the UID, timestamp or
signer key-ID.
2) What exactly is this "PGP signature"? Is it a SHA1 hash of the
message which is encrypted with my private key and then ASCII armored?
regards,
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gn
Hello list
When I install the Windows the recent version of GnuPG gnupg-w32-2.1.20.exe
which registry entries are made and where exactly with which value?
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Martin mailto:msch...@gmail.com
___
Gnupg
e accessible ...
gpg: waiting for file '.../gnupgHome/pubring.gpg' to become accessible ...
gpg: waiting for file '.../gnupgHome/pubring.gpg' to become accessible ...
Yes, exactly same problem on Windows 7 - 32bit Version.
I swichted back to GnuPG 2.1.19 - and there this p
packet of type 12 in keybox
gpg: skipped packet of type 12 in keybox
gpg: skipped packet of type 12 in keybox
gpg: skipped packet of type 12 in keybox
gpg: skipped packet of type 12 in keybox
...
BTW. Back to 2.1.19 because of problems with .20 and .21 on Windows
--
Best regards,
Martin
tar.bz2", oddly. I'm
not sure what makes that one special. Also, I felt I was relying too
much on www.linuxfromscratch.org as my alternate source.
Do you have any specific tips for how to find alternate checksum sources?
Thanks.
--
Jeff Martin
__
es.
My DDG & Goole searches were not enough.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Lee wrote:
> On 6/11/18, NdK wrote:
>> Il 09/06/2018 19:08, Jeff Martin ha scritto:
>>> For a fresh install of GnuPG, I was following the integrity check
>>> directions. I have no prio
t; Il 09/06/2018 19:08, Jeff Martin ha scritto:
>> For a fresh install of GnuPG, I was following the integrity check
>> directions. I have no prior version for GnuPG.
> Why not fetch some (unrelated) live distributions, possibly some older
> ones and some newer ones?
>
> GPG i
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 12:54 PM Martin T wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I reinstalled my workstation and moved ~/.gnupg directory from old
> machine to new one. Gpg version in both workstations is 2.1.18. The
> problem is, that in the new workstation, when I try to decrypt a file,
>
secmem usage: 0/65536 bytes in 0 blocks
$
What might cause this?
thanks,
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
t;gpg
--list-secret-keys" I see two keys, but in the output of
"gpg-connect-agent 'keyinfo --list' /bye" or "ls
~/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d/" I see four keys with different hashes.
Why is that so?
Martin
___
Gnupg-u
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 2:38 PM Damien Goutte-Gattat
wrote:
>
> On 08/24/2018 07:47 AM, Martin T wrote:
> > One more small question- in the output of "gpg --list-keys" or "gpg
> > --list-secret-keys" I see two keys, but in the output of
> > &quo
k to 700. (I also checked, that the gpg.conf file is in fact used.)
Where am I wrong here? Is the setting not what I need, or do I set it
incorrectly, or do I test it incorrectly?
And if the setting is not what I need, how can I prevent the permissions
f
we had to extend the permissions for the
"private-keys-v1.d" directory to group access.
Regards,
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
s.
>
> Long shot: does your system support ACLs?
Using ACL would be possible, but we are reluctant to do so, since it
adds a second permissions layer that is only visible if you actively
look for it.
Regards,
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnup
ugging if we don't look
into the documentation early enough.
Regards,
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
tried and succeeds.
Is there a way to specify a preferred decryption key (that is different
from the default signing key)?
Incidentally, does anybody know how to convince emacs EasyPG to pass
--no-throw-keyids to GPG? :-)
Thank you,
Martin
___
Gnupg
hi
i have been searching the web for information about creating GnuPG
identities mapped to a specific i-name rather than an email address.
i can't find anything about it.
i'm curious to see if anyone has made work on this issue.
context: my understanding of Identity Commons / XDI (OASIS) / 2idi
Francis Gulotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd give you some links off hand (if I had any on hand) for how to
> find any keysigning parties [...]
Such as http://www.biglumber.com/ for example.
--
Martin Geisler GnuPG Key: 0x7E45DD38
u can just make it unusable by
revoking the self signature on it.
(This how I think things work --- please correct me if I'm wrong.)
--
Martin Geisler GnuPG Key: 0x7E45DD38
PHP EXIF Library | PHP Weather | PHP Shell
http://pel.sf.net/
message as one
attachment and the signature as another.
I don't know how Outlook (not Express) handles things.
--
Martin Geisler GnuPG Key: 0x7E45DD38
PHP EXIF Library | PHP Weather | PHP Shell
http://pel.sf.net/| http://phpweath
t go into that).
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_entropy for more on how
to calculate the entropy, but I hope this helped a bit.
--
Martin Geisler GnuPG Key: 0x7E45DD38
PHP EXIF Library | PHP Weather | PHP Shell
http://pel.s
Dear Maxine,
Thank you for being such a great person. I will not forget you!
God Bless,
-mm
P.S. I have it on good authority that all the good wishes are being
auto-forwarded to her "new" email address "over there!" :)
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
[
Hi all.
I have some trouble to set up my cardreader (SCM SCR335, USB) properly
under Fedora Cor 5 (with udev). The cardreader itself and the
OpenPGP-card work fine on my notebook (Debian Sarge, with hotplug), so
it is not a hardware problem.
Furthermore, i can use the cardreader with the gnupg cc
Hi all.
I have some trouble to set up my cardreader (SCM SCR335, USB) properly
under Fedora Cor 5 (with udev). The cardreader itself an the
OpenPGP-card work fine on my notebook (Debian Sarge, with hotplug), so
it is not a hardware problem.
Furthermore, i can use the cardreader with the gnupg cci
Hi Werner.
Thanks for your answer.
Werner Koch schrieb:
> Andreas Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> # ls -l /proc/bus/usb/001
>> -rw-rw 1 root scard 111 18. Mai 13:32 005
>
> Check with fuser or lsof that no other process is using this file.
fuser an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michael.
Michael Bienia schrieb:
> On 2006-05-20 16:37:47 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi Michael.
> Hi Andreas,
>
>> You hit the mark! When I change the permissions in /dev/bus/usb/001/005,
>> GnuPG works fine with my cardreader - even as n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Gray wrote:
>>> AES256 is listed as a cipher but not a public key? What is the
>>> The difference? I was hoping to use asymmetric keys with me
>>> Giving the public key to the customer. As mentioned before this all
>>> Works fine but I'm not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Laurent Jumet schrieb:
> When sending a message like this one, signed, compressed but not
crypted,
> is there anything that goes bad, in security terms?
> This is to avoid problems with line lenghth and charsets through internet
>
In securit
Hi
I have secure/public keyrings on two different systems (Windows and
Linux). How to easily synchronize the to keyrings? On both systems I
insert up and now some new public keys - but they should be available
on both systems.
--
ms
___
Gnupg-users
in what I have tried so far?
Please CC me when replying, as I'm not subscribed to the list. I have
attached my locale configuration and most of my .muttrc (the GnuPG
relevant part) inline. Thanks in advance.
Martin
Attachments:
1. locale configuration:
$ locale -a
C
en_DK
27;t want to spend my time working around shortcomings in crap
software.
Thanks again.
Martin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
planned for dirmngr any time soon?
Regards
Martin
--
Martin Wilck
PRIMERGY System Software Engineer
FSC IP ESP DEV 6
Fujitsu Siemens Computers GmbH
Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1
33106 Paderborn
Germany
Tel:++49 5251 8 15113
Fax:++49 5251 8 20209
Email
sense in practice.
I understand RSA and I cannot imagine compatibility problems with
other implementations, but I'd still like to reopen the issue and
ask this list what they think about >2048bit keys, and 8192bit in
particular.
Thanks,
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://
be able to handle larger
keys?
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
"with sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. however, this is not
necessarily a good idea. it is hard to be sure where they are going
to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under the
d need changing?
> However, 3072 bit signing had another bug which I fixed this
> morning. Thus you need to use the latest SVN.
So 3072bit keys generated with GnuPG from Debian unstable are
unusable, or unusable with the SmartCard?
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.
won't ask any interactive questions. And
still using a temporary keyring which causes a number of additional
commands to set things up and clean up afterwards.
Is there an alternative? Some kind of undocumented feature? Any hint?
If there isn't, do you agree that there should be, i.e
a. I have started work on a Facebook applet to
automate this process, so that I can keep such vital information
with everything else that I care about.
Strangely appropriate, randomly selected quote below.
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
"we are trapped in the
nothing without enough dead bodies.
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ome/ssd/madduck/.tmp/cdt.p0R8ly/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
gpg: key 55C9882D999BBCC4: public key "Martin F. Krafft
" imported
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
% gpg --list-keys !$
gpg --list-keys 0x55C9882D999BB
uck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
dies ist eine manuell generierte email. sie beinhaltet
tippfehler und ist auch ohne großbuchstaben gültig.
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-polic
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-- lars wirzenius
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
sentenc.es/
"convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
- friedrich nietzsche
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft
two.sentenc.es/
"durch frauen werden die höhepunkte des lebens bereichert
und die tiefpunkte vermehrt."
- friedrich nietzsche
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
___
enc.es/
"the scientific paper in its orthodox form does embody a totally
mistaken conception, even a travesty, of the nature of scientific
thought."
-- sir peter medawar
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
De
ever a body is obliged to do.
play consists of whatever a body is not obliged to do."
-- mark twain
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.ne
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
nature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
also sprach Peter Lebbing [2017-06-23 17:56 +0200]:
> There are two hard problems in computer science: Cache invalidation,
> naming things, and off-by-one errors.
I haven't heard that one in years. Lol. ;)
> Martin, I think --no-auto-check-trustdb and a cron job will
> already
> "Oskar" == Oskar L
> "No Debian package for 1.4.2"
> Thu, 8 Sep 2005 20:26:10 +0300 (EEST)
Oskar> Does anyone know why there still isn't a Debian package for
Oskar> version 1.4.2 of GnuPG? http://packages.debian.org/gnupg
You can file a Debian wishlist bug report against gn
> "Johan" == Johan Wevers
> "Re: legally binding digital sigs"
> Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:50:43 +0200 (MET DST)
Johan> Atom Smasher wrote:
>> does anyone know what makes a digital signature legally binding
>> (or not) under US law?
Johan> US law? I'd say enough money to pa
> "ds" == David Shaw
> "Re: auto-key-locate pka (gpg version 1.4.3)"
> Sat, 8 Apr 2006 20:11:48 -0400
ds> This means that the build of GnuPG you has no DNS support (pka
ds> and cert require DNS support, and ldap and keyserver don't).
Wouldn't it be nice if 'gpg --version' pri
other such tools).
The utility is available as a tarball, source RPM and noarch RPM,
and I welcome any feedback or bug reports.
- -Martin
[0] http://linux-ip.net/software/#pine-gpg-filter pine-gpg-filter
[1] http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ pinepg
[2] http://hany.sk/~hany/sof
I wrote a wrapper script [1] (which has never been audited), which
makes aespipe a touch more friendly to use on the command line.
Best of luck,
- -Martin
* Beware the wonderful word "random" when speaking to those who
are professionally engaged in cryptograp
store the socket itself.
When gpg-agent is allowed to exit gracefully, it should clean up its
sockets (see atexit handler called cleanup in gpg-agent.c).
Best,
- -Martin
[0] find /var /tmp -type s
- --
Martin A. Brown
http://linux-ip.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2
d> 5 # -- for ultimate trust of the identified key
Command> y #yes, you want to ultimately trust this key
shell$ gpg --update-trustdb # -- not strictly required
Then try using the key again.
Good luck,
- -Martin
- --
Martin A. Brown
http://linux-ip.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNA
On Debian lenny/sid with the following Debian packages installed:
,[ dlocate -l 'gnupg|gpg'|grep '^i' (lines chopped) ]
ii gnupg 1.4.6-2GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement
ii gnupg-agent2.0.6-1GNU privacy guard - password agent
ii gnupg2
> "wk" == Werner Koch
> "Re: Surprising gnupg-agent action with OpenPGP card"
> Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:10:41 +0200
wk> On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: o
>> With 'use-agent' in ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf both 'gpg --card-status'
>> and 'gpg2 --card-status' show the s
> "wk" == Werner Koch
> "Re: Surprising gnupg-agent action with OpenPGP card"
> Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:53:35 +0200
wk> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> What can I do to better isolate or characterize this problem?
wk> If gpg-agent is installed (which is
> "wk" == Werner Koch
> "Re: Surprising gnupg-agent action with OpenPGP card"
> Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:23:35 +0200
wk> Add debugging to gpg-agent, using verbose and log-file in
wk> gpg-agent.conf could suffice. You might also want to use
wk> watchgnupg daemon which is a smar
Hi, All,
My name is Martin, and I'm from south China. I've invested nearly a month
in searching for IKEv2 vpn auth with yubikey on macos. I have installed
pgp-agent already. I try to choose the cert in yubikey and hopefully the
pgp-agent could interact with yubikey, but failed to pr
ualification in existence for the information security generalist. I agree
that hard industry experience is important, and as with any other
qualification, an ability to walk the walk is more important than talking the
talk.
Martin Taylor CISSP
Information Security Manager
Oxfordshire County Cou
101 - 182 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
