My apologies if this has come up before. I notice Serpent-256 is available
in libgcrypt. Is it available in GPG?
Sincerely,
--
P.S.: I prefer to be reached on BitMessage at
BM-2D8txNiU7b84d2tgqvJQdgBog6A69oDAx6.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-user
On Thursday, August 22, 2013, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> And the best way to do get started on the path to standardization is to
> provide a patch for an existing implementation (probably using an
> algorithm number from the experimental range [0] that implements it, to
> demonstrate feasibility
which is not bad at all, i
recommend all you to give this a try.
The stick is yes, a openpgp smartcard with a USB
interface not more than that.
--
Frank
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo
ppreciated.
Kind regards
Frank
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
b o r t i n g . . .\0 D B F C 6 A D 9 h a s
n o u s e
25624996: r i d p a c k e t\0 % s\n\0 D B F C 6 A D 9
h a s n o
25624996:u s e r i d p a c k e t\0 a b o r t i n g . .
.\0 1 E 4 2
25624996: B 3 6 7 h a s n o u s e r i d p a c
Hi Werner,
I assume you are busy with the 2.30 release (congratulations!) but you
have any more hints how to get more informations on my compile problem?
Any help is appreciated.
Kind regards
Frank
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
workaround or fix I can use? (linking/provides)
Kind regards
Frank
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
e definition of the symbol was not found.
rtld: 0712-001 Symbol _GLOBAL__AIXD_libgpg_error_so was referenced
from module
/opt/freeware/lib/python3.7/site-packages/libdnf/_common_types.so(),
but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found.
Hope this helps. :)
It definitely does
that? And most preferably, how
to make xlc or xlclang++ generate those symbols?
Kind regards
Frank
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
xlc, xlC, xlc++ they only support -qhalt={i,w,e,s}
only xlclang++ seems to support it.
see
https://www.ibm.com/docs/cs/xl-c-and-cpp-aix/16.1?topic=descriptions-qhalt-werror
If I am on the wrong path, just tell me.
Kind regards
Frank
___
Gnupg-user
Hello,
These first two may be kinda a preferences thing, but
I'm no expert in the field and I could not read the
math even if I wanted to, so try to be easy on me.
Which algorithm is most secure/is there more non-college-math
info on the web somewhere (no wikipedia please)?
IDEA, 3DES, CAST5, BLO
The fact that you can't use the plain text and the cipher text to recover the
private key is simply AMAZING. You really should mention that fact in the faq.
>> Is it polite to post saying that you want to sign keys with somebody
>> on a random mailing list?
>
> Depends a lot on the mailing list.
Hi again, I have been browsing and downloading gpg signed files and I'm acctually been downloading the sigs! However, I'm having trouble figuring out who signed what. Is there some way to determin this using the sig? Perhaps it has the keys fingerpinnt in it or something. For obvious things like th
Yes, that is exactly what I desire. But when I run I get:
gpg --verify
And it hangs until I hit ctrl-D and then I get:
gpg: verify signatures failed: Unknown system error
If I select a paricular file I get:
gpg2 --verify gtypist-2.9.tar.xz.sig gtypist-2.9.tar.xz
gpg: Signature
phrase
gpg: decryption failed: Bad session key
Regards,
--
Frank Hrebabetzky +49 / 9261 / 950 0565
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi there,
I had a bad timing with my post, so just as a reminder for those who
were absorbed by the holidays. Any hint?
Regards,
--
Frank Hrebabetzky +49 / 9261 / 950 0565
On 1/3/19 3:25 PM, Frank Hrebabetzky wrote:
Hi all,
I have 2 encrypted files on my PC, let's call
On 1/20/19 5:34 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
Hi Frank,
On 03/01/2019 15:25, Frank Hrebabetzky wrote:
gpg: AES256 encrypted data
gpg: encrypted with 1 passphrase
gpg: decryption failed: Bad session key
This is also the error message you get when you specify the wrong
passphrase. Perhaps you
ther.
My latest successful build was 1.9.4.
Any ideas?
Is sticking with LTS version (1.8.x) a viable solution?
Kind regards
Frank
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ommand is 8.
> end ---<
Which looks somehow vaguely familiar.
Any tips?
Kind regards
Frank
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
gpgshell.
It works fine I am using it now and have removed all encryption tools from my
pc. The file manager in gpgshell works fine. For me to do encryption and
decryption.
If I can help please send me any questions in plain text.
FRANK D. HUBENY
RMA SUPERVISOR
Philips Medical Systems
Cardio
27;t here, doesn't mean it's not somewhere.
Frank
--
gpg id EB547226 Revoked Forgot Password :(
aMSN: Frankly3D
http://www.frankly3d.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-use
r is not agreeing on a single distribution
workflow but having different options live and in the wild. This
could protect against suprising disruption attacks against the
ecosystem as it happended with keyservers in the past.
--
kind regards
Frank
pgpyQKQLI9CA4.pgp
Descripti
e/gnupg
[4] https://software.shimps.net/
--
kind regards
Frank
pgpbkgO1QdJtO.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 17:00:42 +0100
Frank Guthausen wrote:
>
> I set up a Debian apt repository on my domain
There is some more detailed explanation in
a blog article[1] including a brief howto.
> Even in the file ``shimps.list'' there is an annoying
> string ``./vanilla&
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 17:00:42 +0100
Frank Guthausen wrote:
>
> shimps-gnupg-ng - GnuPG 2.5.2 shipping speedo compiled binaries only
> in /opt/local/shimps (32M) including libraries
Updated to GnuPG 2.5.3 (released yesterday 2025-01-09)
from the ``GnuPG (devel
od_mime.c) dependent substructure.
I improved both kinds of situation to a
full green output and learned a few things.
--
kind regards
Frank
pgpK1DrDabN5M.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-keys --with-fingerprint --with-fingerprint | grep -B2 "8777 461F
2A07 4EBC 480D 3594 19CC 1C9E 085B 107A"
The option for the fingerprint is invoked twice.
--
kind regards
Frank
pgp9N4pA69K1o.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 09:30:50 +0100
Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:07, Frank Guthausen said:
>
> > $ gpg --list-keys --with-fingerprint --with-fingerprint | grep -B2
> > "8777 461F 2A07 4EBC 480D 3594 19CC 1C9E 085B 107A"
>
> gpg
figure out the reason
why the gettext data seems to be unknown, which
might require some better knowledge of Parabola
than I can provide.
--
kind regards
Frank
pgpq0BIzbfob7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
usted.
debug1: ssh_connect: needpriv 0
debug1: Connecting to hostname [IP] port 22.
debug1: Connection established.
debug1: identity file /export/home/frank/.ssh/identity type -1
debug1: identity file /export/home/frank/.ssh/id_rsa type -1
debug1: identity file /export/home/frank/.ssh/id_dsa type -1
d
On 24.07.10 08:21, Werner Koch wrote:
The problem though is when I'm trying to get SSH to work with it. It
wont authenticate.
Does "ssh-add -l" sdhow the key?
Yes it shows up here
2010-07-23 20:01:57 gpg-agent[1315] gpg-agent (GnuPG) 2.0.13 started
It would better to try 2.0.16 becuase that
31 matches
Mail list logo
