nPGP standard for this to
happen. Anyway, a signature on a key means nothing whatsoever unless you
happen to trust the key that issued the signature, so unless you
countersigned the key that signed yours, there is a high degree of
deniability.
- --
Alphax
OpenPGP key: 0xF874C613 - http://tinyurl.c
you a list of the keyids on
request) permanantly corrupted?
- --
Alphax
OpenPGP key: 0xF874C613 - http://tinyurl.com/cc9up
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,'
and those to whom God says, 'All right, then, h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alphax wrote:
> Recently, I discovered the following message on GPG startup:
>
> gpg: signature packet without timestamp
>
More fun:
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
gpg: signature packet witho
oading!)
> How are all these projects related to each other?
>
I also was confused about this. However, WinPT is extraordinarily slow
for me to use - it caches the entire keyring when it loads/anything
changes, and with 700 keys it becomes unusable (actually, I gave up when
my keyring
> gpg --keyring --primary-keyring
combined with the import statement may (or may not) do want you want.
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards
http://ti
assphrase-fd 0 --decrypt
>>InFile
>
>
> Hmm. What version of zlib are you using?
>
Is this related to the zlib security flaw mentioned back around the 8th
of July? Sounds like it might almost be a buffer overflow error...
- --
Alphax | /"\
En
ckups - just in case it gets
corrupted, but I want to rebuild my keyring from some saved point.
Make sure *before you do anything else* that you have a backup of your
secret key *and a revocation certificate*, in case anything bad happens...
- --
Alphax | /"\
Enc
have both a backup of it
and a revocation certificate.
As for the encrypted file systems... Windows supports whole disk
encryption in various forms as well.
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |
GPG work with a localhost-based proxy
even?
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up| / \
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Forwarded since it seems useful
- Original Message
Subject: Re: Proof of email ownership
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 09:07:24 +0200
From: Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Alphax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gnupg-use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Thomas Kuehne wrote:
> Points taken - Have you ever looked at an signed (using MIME) message in
> OutlookExpress? RRR .
>
>
> Thomas
>
Sorry, I've never used Lookout.
- --
Alphax
, the goof-ball *is* the recipient. At that point,
*Draw circle on desk*
*Bang head here*
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up
;Using Enigmail with Thunderbird" and went
"Ooh! I have Thunderbird! I have a potentially compatible system!" and
then read and installed stuff and discovered how OpenPGP works.
So yes, it does happen. You are speaking to the converted :)
- --
Alphax | /&
#x27;t get myself motivated to improve it.
>
The password hashing is supposed to make it *difficult* to crack
passphrases, because of the computational cost!
Don't find a fast way to break them and force us all to use 200
character passphrases!
- --
Alphax | /&qu
haracter passphrases!
>
>
> Apart from the fact that this is (more or less) security by obscurity
> even if my program would be a million times faster, 7 characters still
> would take a day.
>
How long will 8 characters (standard unix password length) take to break
at present?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
David Srbecky wrote:
> vCard Subpacket (type 102)
> --
> Subpacket specific data:
>magic identification number
>data - content of the vCard file
>
*c
sing:
gpg --import-options repair-pks-subkey-bug --import-options
import-clean-sigs --import-options import-clean-uids --recv-keys 0xE0BB4BCD
on the command line re-added the signatures, but --edit-key clean
removed them again.
This definately seems like a bug.
and line:
gpg --edit-key (keyid)
revsig
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up| / \
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gnu
gt; Linux:
> SeaMonkey Mail Client
> KMail
> Konqueror
>
I believe that there is also a plugin available for KMail.
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML e
d help!
>
>
> nevermind... i found an old backed-up copy of my private key... sorry
> for the fuss.
>
Generate a revocation certificate NOW and store it in a secure offline
location, along with a backup of your key.
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email
cond individual could add
> their signature after me.
>
Use detached signatures? Generate a key to sign the document with, and
have that key signed by the supervisor?
Just my 2c...
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Op
o
set your import and export options to clean these signatures automatically.
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up| / \
___
ul in the following scenario:
>
Is that even allowed??
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up| / \
__
Zeljko Vrba wrote:
> Alphax wrote:
>
>> Zeljko Vrba wrote:
>>
>>> Joe Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> For example, your CA can revoke your key leaving you with one key that
>>>> is invalid X.509, but valid OpenPGP? Yuck!
>>>
Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 11:48:45PM +0930, Alphax wrote:
>
>>>The application is free to do whatever it wants with these objects,
>>>given sufficient authentication to the card (PIN). Technically, there is
>>>nothing CA can do to prev
res are leaking into the
> keyserver net.
>
Probably some PGP users who are "automagically" synchronising their
entire keyrings with multiple keyservers, leaking keys that their owners
would rather not have on the keyservers in the process :(
--
Alphax | /"
u trust the Microsoft CryptoAPI? Well why don't you just run Windows,
which Microsoft Says is Perfectly Secure, and use Microsoft's inbuilt
X.509 instead of OpenPGP, since Microsoft Guarantees No Back Doors in
the CryptoAPI?
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Prefe
he standard size of the EEPROM on a smartcard suitable for
OpenPGP?
2. What else could you fit on such a card?
3. Is it possible to have multiple things on a smartcard without them
conflicting?
Thanks,
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon C
his is similar to the reason why Enigmail insists on GPG
instead of being able to interface with PGP on Windows systems.
In that case, it appears that GNU/Linux has the upper hand, because at
least there are *some* GPL/LGPL libraries available for what you want.
With Windows, it appears that ev
Peter Gutmann wrote:
> Alphax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>Zeljko Vrba wrote:
>>
>>>Joe Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>>For example, your CA can revoke your key leaving you with one key that
>>>>is invalid X.509, but valid OpenPGP? Yuck!
&
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Alphax wrote:
>> The only place in the GPL where libraries are mentioned is in
>> reference to the LGPL. Using the Microsoft CryptoAPI doesn't appear
>> to be legal; AFAICT, this is similar to the reason why Enigmail
>> insists on GPG instead
t would work). I have
friends who currently don't want to use PGP because they fear that their
keys will be uploaded to a keyserver, and then they will be spammed
forever more.
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
O
Johan Wevers wrote:
> Alphax wrote:
>>Removing duplicated signatures however would probably have little impact,
>>assuming you are removing only the newest ones
>
> Don't you mean keeping the newst ones?
>
Er, yes. However as David Shaw pointed out further down th
ng it to stop? It seems like the obvious first step.
>
Well, I don't know *where* they are coming from, but I (and the kind
soul who worked it out and told me) know think we know *how* it's being
done. And unfortunately, it's very easy (too easy!) to do, especially
for someo
their key, but has a
trusted revoker set... there are other situations where someone other
than the key's owner would want to upload the key, but I can't think of
them at the moment.
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferre
ture of the
uploading key... how much of an extra burden would this be?
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up| / \
Zeljko Vrba wrote:
> Alphax wrote:
>
>>However, the keyserver would then have to verify the signature of the
>>uploading key... how much of an extra burden would this be?
>>
>
> In what way "extra burden"? Computationally (CPU), programming
> complexity
t; command listed - this may just
> be an oversight in
> the doc file, of course.
>
> I'll away and try exporting my keyring to see what happens.
>
You need to put gpg.conf in the same directory as you keyrings (eg.
C:\Documents and Settings\Bob\Application Data\GnuPG under Wind
their keys with GD sigs out to SKS keyservers; secondly,
someone doing a 2-way synchronisation of their entire keyring with both
the GD and the SKS network.
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |
cdr wrote:
> MUS1876 wrote:
>> Alphax wrote:
>>> I have friends who currently don't want to use PGP because they
>>> fear that their keys will be uploaded to a keyserver, and then
>>> they will be spammed forever more.
>>
>>
>> I totally
OpenPGP defiend formats: Binary and ASCII
> armored. It will automagically detect the mode. See rfc2440 for the
> OpenPGP key formats.
>
>
Can GPG use ascii-armored keyrings? Or must keyrings be binary files?
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferre
le right away because
I've gotten the procedure wrong in the first place? ;)
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up| / \
614,055,611 bytes.
>
> Can anyone please help!
>
> Using gpg version 1.4.2, official Windows version
>
I have a feeling Windows has problems with files this large, esp. on NTFS.
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
sing OpenPGP :)
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up| / \
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Christian Stork wrote:
> As requested:
>
> So, what's algo 121 ?
>
According to http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2440.txt, it doesn't exist. The
message is probably corrupt.
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Rib
which takes Cards in SIM size. I guess it should work ..?!
>
Of course, the problem with a card that small is that you could swallow
it (or otherwise lose it) ;)
I wonder if someone will start producing SIM-sized OpenPGP cards? How
about as SD/XD cards?
- --
Alphax
encryption. You can however
generate RSA sign & encrypt keys.
> Any other possibilitys to use this Key, so it is compatible with PGP?
>
I'll cc: this to PGP-Basics @ yahoogroups; see what the people over
there can dig up.
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Klaus Fuerstberger wrote:
> Alphax said the following on 10/04/05 12:04:
>
>
>>>>a time ago I created a "Sign Only" DSA Key with an ElGamal Encrypt
>>>>Subkey. Now I noticed that it is not possible to en
gt;
> Can I put custom text into "Version:" in stage of exporting public key,
> making signatures, encrypting with ASCII output, etc.?
>
> Sometimes I do not wish that others will know what exactly OpenPGP
> implementation and OS I'm currently using.
>
Well, yo
s, and random file names.
> For some of them you remember passwords, for most of them you don't (nobody
> reasonable can expect you to remember 10s of thousands passwords).
>
Finally, something to do with all my Nigerian/pharmaceutical spam! :)
- --
Alphax
really breaks backwards
compatability standards.
Thanks,
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up| / \
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
eem to change the key, only the way gpg handles it (when
> exported it's still the same). Included below is the output from pgpdump,
> in case that's of any help.
>
Re-import it from a keyserver, the copy on the SKS network has a valid
self-sig...
If that doesn't work, gpg
ithin each missive to confirm authenticity.
>
Create a seperate signing and encryption subkeys and export them,
disabling the secret part of the primary key when you do so. A good
tutorial on this is available at http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/subkeys
- --
Alphax | /"
at case I lose the "ultimate" tag to the left of the primary key.
> What does this tag mean here? Which way to have this tag for the new
> uids created?
>
UIDs *should* be self-signed upon creation. Trying signing your key with
itself and updating the trust database.
- --
Alpha
an alternative to GnuPG's
> personal (face-to-face) methods.
>
Several people who I've tried to get using OpenPGP just "don't get it"
because it's "too hard to integrate with (email client, usually
Mail.app)" and have gone for Thawte X.509 certificates in
ources that his policy was derived from.
Oh, one other thing: You need to make the source of the document (a
"transparent copy" in legalese) available. Plain HTML is pretty OK for that.
HTH,
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Ca
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
gpg: signature packet without keyid
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
Now, I figured that cleaning the keys would probably fix this, but the
question is: how do I find the offending keys?
Or should I just batch-clean the lot?
- --
Alphax
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:53:51PM +0930, Alphax wrote:
>
>>Recently, when checking my trustb I get the following appearing:
>>
>>gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
>>gpg: signature packet witho
there any other drawbacks of Biglumber?
>
Biglumber *does* (AFAIK) allow multiple keys per email address. That's
one of the reasons it's better than the GD.
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF8
B
> c) ZIP
> d) Uncompressed
> Correct?
Since you "don't care" about Windows users, bzip2 is fine. GPG is pretty
good though; I use Windows and don't have any problems with bzip2.
> IV) How to create my new key the best way?
>
> Ok these day
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Topas wrote:
> Hi.
>
> When are we going to have ECC support in GnuPG?
>
Is it in OpenPGP yet?
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613
d it's way into server protocol implementations?
> Are there any hidden problems at first sight?
>
It would disallow freeform UIDs.
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Ag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:08:55AM +0930, Alphax wrote:
>
>>David Shaw wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:53:51PM +0930, Alphax wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Recent
al keyrings with
> hundreds of keys? Because you don't have the corresponding signing
> key in your local keyring, gpg cannot verify them, so these
> signatures are not useful for you. (With the exception, that you have
> a visual hint that there are more signatures on the keyserve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:53:51PM +0930, Alphax wrote:
>
>>Recently, when checking my trustb I get the following appearing:
>>
>>gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
>>gpg: signature packet witho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alphax wrote:
> David Shaw wrote:
>
>>>On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:53:51PM +0930, Alphax wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Recently, when checking my trustb I get the following appearing:
>>>>
>>
cs on ownertrust files in the
source code?
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up| / \
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alphax wrote:
> I know this is probably a bad idea, but I want to do it anyway...
>
> Is there anyway to set ownertrust on a key in batch mode?
>
> If there isn't, how can I generate an ownertrust file and import it?
>
>
ut this, an attacker can "steal" a signing subkey from someone
>>else and try and pretend that a signature came from his own key. It's
>>not a particularly good attack: the attacker can't issue signatures to
>>prove his ownership.
>
>
> I should add that t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:47:08PM +1030, Alphax wrote:
>
>>David Shaw wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:24:09PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On
a signature came from his own key. It's
> not a particularly good attack: the attacker can't issue signatures to
> prove his ownership.
>
Will this remove the possibility of moving subkeys from one primary key
to another / converting primary keys to subkeys (documented at
http:
n-local signing, and many keys in the keyserver network have PGP GD
sigs on them, again due to "automagic" refreshing (most likely through
LDAP).
I realise that this has turned into a bit of a screed, but it looks like
the best policy is: Don't do stuff unless you know what you are do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 04:32:07PM +1030, Alphax wrote:
>
>>David Shaw wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:47:08PM +1030, Alphax wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>David Shaw wrote
P
> currently has no way to make a "negative" signature.
>
If it did, there would be a corresponding "Web of Antitrust".
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Agai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:04:27AM +1030, Alphax wrote:
>
>
>>>It's as official as any release that hasn't happened yet: that is to
>>>say, we're happy and thrilled if you test it ou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 04:39:40PM +1030, Alphax wrote:
>
>>David Shaw wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:15:16PM +0300, Pawel Shajdo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 11:55:02PM +1030, Alphax wrote:
>
>
>>>>>It's a countermeasure against an attack against signing subkeys.
>>>>>Basically, the primary key signs all subkeys.
This does not affect third-party signatures.
>>
>>
> Good,.. so I could change this as often as I'd like to, correct?
>
I wouldn't advise it. Add a subkey. If you don't want your primary key
to be "accidentaly" used for si
ey) used for? I thought this is used for primary
>>selfsigs.
>
>
> No, 0x13 (or 0x10, 0x11, 0x12) are used to sign a user ID and primary
> key together. Historically, people call this "signing a key", but
> it's really signing a user ID + key.
>
&
list say?
>
>
Mailman seems to be okay with such things... generally adding a mailing
list footer won't mangle PGP/MIME (I've never seen it mangle inline
PGP), but once you add attachments the list footer will start breaking
things.
--
Alphax | /"
the help though.
>
Erm... I know(?) GPG is meant to use a subkey "where possible" (ie. if a
signing subkey exists it will use it, if an encryption subkeys exists it
will use it), but is it meant to exhibit the same behaviour as PGP in
that it will use the newest subkey if no
Pubkey: RSA, RSA-E, RSA-S, ELG-E, DSA
Cipher: 3DES (S2), CAST5 (S3), BLOWFISH (S4), AES (S7), AES192 (S8),
AES256 (S9), TWOFISH (S10)
Hash: MD5 (H1), SHA1 (H2), RIPEMD160 (H3), SHA256 (H8), SHA384 (H9),
SHA512 (H10)
Compression: Uncompressed (Z0), ZIP (Z1), ZLIB (Z2)
HTH,
--
Alph
use whatever compression scheme you want and pipe it into
> |gpg --compress-algo none.
> One tool one job :).
>
Yes, this has the added "advantage" that your recipient has to be able
to deal with whatever non-standard compression you choose. YMMV.
--
Alphax
t and many
>>>others.
>>
>>I suggest Gajim which is truly ellegant and available for Linux and
>>Windows.
>
>
> I not used gajim yet. I prefer tkabber and psi at the moment.
> Tkabber can sign messages with gnupg.
> PSI/Tkabber
> Any clue? Thanks in advance.
>
Is the secret part of the primary key available in your local keyring?
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Ag
Under GPG 1.4.3rc1 I'm completely unable to get the cURL-type keyserver
handlers to function correctly. For example, using the following command:
gpg --no-options --keyserver sks.keyserver.penguin.de --search Alphax
I get the error:
?: localhost: Unable to connect: ec=0
gpgkeys: HTTP s
David Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 04:09:32PM +1030, Alphax wrote:
>
>>Under GPG 1.4.3rc1 I'm completely unable to get the cURL-type keyserver
>>handlers to function correctly. For example, using the following command:
>>
>>gpg --no-options --keyserve
David Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 04:42:19PM +1030, Alphax wrote:
>
>>David Shaw wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 04:09:32PM +1030, Alphax wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Under GPG 1.4.3rc1 I'm completely unable to get the cURL-
David Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:24:40PM +1030, Alphax wrote:
>
>
>>Host: sks.keyserver.penguin.de
>>Command:SEARCH
>>gpgkeys: HTTP URL is
>>`http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&options=mr
>>&s
David Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:52:40AM +1030, Alphax wrote:
>
>>David Shaw wrote:
>>
>>>That looks correct so far. I don't suppose you have an environment
>>>variable http_proxy set?
>>>
>>
>>Yes, but I thought tha
s
it; if so, it won't try to.
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up| / \
signature.asc
Descripti
t; probably a better use for LDAP capabilities than to store public keys...
>
> Perhaps something to add in the future?
> (feature request ;-)
>
Isn't this what Kerberos was designed for?
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / AS
t; .. where it hung.
>
Running gpg with no arguments assumes that you're either going to type
something to sign/encrypt (followed by ^D) or paste a signed/encrypted
blob which it will verify/decrypt. You need:
# gpg --armor --export mykey > mykey.asc
HTH,
--
Alphax
write a Lua extesion for it :)
> i dont want to decrypt files first and than open them. i want to do
> this in one step.
>
If you're on W32 you can try GPGShell which has an "edit clipboard"
function available from the tray. Otherwise KGPG etc.
--
Alphax
cert. Would you
> elaborate on "beat"?
>
Sore out of luck. People will keep using the key which is on the key
server, and you will be unable to do anything except reply "Sorry, I
lost that secret key, can't decrypt, here is my new key".
there.
>
>
Use --keyring on the command line, or without the -- in your
config file. A ~/ in will be expanded to $HOME, and if no path
details are given it is assumed that the file is in $GNUPGHOME (usually
~/.gnupg/).
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Prefer
.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2006-February/028073.html
and their replies.
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up| / \
signature.a
to your gpg exectution command, ie.
$ gpg -a --homedir /path/to/.gnupg --trust-model always -r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --batch -o sql.asc -e sql.gz
or add
trust-model always
to your .gnupg/gpg.conf file.
HTH,
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ /
1.4.2.2 ASAP.
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up| / \
signature.asc
Description: Open
ws version?
>
> Because it won't work with Windows. It requires a Bourne shell and
> the tar tool - this is not available under Windows.
>
Unless you have Cygwin or MSYS.
--
Alphax
Message composed: 2006-04-05T19:54:29+09:30
___
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
