-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Folkert van Heusden wrote: > IIRC 200/s on a 2.8GHz P4 > I discussed improving nasty with an unnamed gpg-expert and he thought it > should be feasable to do at least a million per second. But as nasty is > a proof of concept I can't get myself motivated to improve it. >
The password hashing is supposed to make it *difficult* to crack passphrases, because of the computational cost! Don't find a fast way to break them and force us all to use 200 character passphrases! - -- Alphax | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC+cjW/RxM5Ph0xhMRA/kBAJ44GZ2ItWPGJTry1in5Aa5mWUZNYACghLbt DokaN4ak6NkRgp9wNbYeddw= =Bbk6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
